Net Positive Charge on 1km Power Line

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a high voltage direct power line consisting of two conductors that are oppositely charged and suspended 3 meters apart. The electric field halfway between the conductors is given as 15000 N/C, and the original poster is trying to determine the excess positive charge on a 1 km length of the positively charged conductor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the electric field and the charge distribution on the conductors, questioning the assumptions regarding the lengths of the conductors and their charge magnitudes. Some suggest treating the lines as infinitely long and consider the implications of equal but opposite charges on the electric field.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches to calculate the electric field and the associated charges. There is an ongoing exploration of how to represent the electric fields produced by both conductors and the implications of their directions. Some participants express confusion about the assumptions made regarding the charges and the resulting electric fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of accurately determining distances and the implications of assuming equal magnitudes of charge on both conductors. There is also mention of the need for visual representation to clarify the direction of electric fields at a midpoint between the conductors.

Buffu
Messages
851
Reaction score
147

Homework Statement


Consider a high voltage direct power line which consist of two conductor suspended 3 meters apart. The lines are oppositely charged, If electric field halfway between them is ##15000N/C## how much is the excess positive charge on a 1 km length of positive conductor ?

Homework Equations



##\displaystyle E = {2Q \over y \sqrt{4y^2 + l^2}}##

where ##l## is length of wire, ##y## is the distance of the charge from the wire and the wire is kept on the x-axis.

The Attempt at a Solution



Electric field between the conductors will be sum of indiviual E fields, so I calculated indiviual E field and then took the sum.

##\displaystyle E_{+ve} = {4kQ \over 3 \sqrt{9 + 10^6}}##

##\displaystyle E_{-ve} {-4kq \over 3\sqrt{9 + 10^6}}##

Solve for ##Q - q## in ##E = E_{+ve} + E_{-ve}## I get ##1.25 \times 10^{-3} C##

But the given answer is ##6.26 \times 10^{-4} C##

Am I missing something ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are considering E at a point halfway between the two lines. How far is this point from each of the lines?

This distance is very small compared to the length of the lines. So, it is safe to treat the lines as "infinitely long".

Also, I believe the two lines are considered to have equal but opposite charges. Otherwise, the problem would not have a definite answer.
 
it seems like two infinity line charge,,,
at an infinity line charge, E is ##E = \frac {2 k λ} {a} ##
where λ is charge per length, and a is distance perpendicular from the line,
there're two oppositely lines, so ##2 E = 15000N/C## ,

Just for suggestion, by subtituting a, then from magnitude of λ, it would be determined the charge that excessed,,,
 
TSny said:
You are considering E at a point halfway between the two lines. How far is this point from each of the lines?

This distance is very small compared to the length of the lines. So, it is safe to treat the lines as "infinitely long".

Also, I believe the two lines are considered to have equal but opposite charges. Otherwise, the problem would not have a definite answer.

It does not matter much, I tried that also. I get roughly same as above.

I used ##E_{+ve} = {2k\lambda \over R} = 12\times 10^6 Q##

and ##E_{-ve} = -12 \times 10^6 q##.

I get the exact same answer when I equate ##E_{+ve} + E_{-ve} = 15000##
 
Last edited:
Are you now getting the correct answer? If not, are you using the correct distance for R?
 
TSny said:
Are you now getting the correct answer? If not, are you using the correct distance for R?
No I don't. I am using ##3/2## for the distance, I think it is correct.
Should I post complete calculation ?
 
Buffu said:
No I don't. I am using ##3/2## for the distance, I think it is correct.
OK
Should I post complete calculation?
Yes, please.
 
TSny said:
OK
Yes, please.
##\lambda = \dfrac{Q}{1000}##

##E_{+ve} = \dfrac{2k\lambda}{R} = \dfrac{2 \times 9 \times 10^9 }{3/2} \cdot \dfrac{Q}{1000} =## 12 x 10^6 Q

Similarly, we replace ##-q## for ##Q## and get ##E_{-ve} = -12 \times 10^6 q##

##E_t = E_{+ve} + E_{-ve} =12 \times 10^6 Q - 12 \times 10^6q \implies 1.5 \times 10^4= 12 \times 10^6 (Q - q) \implies Q -q = 1.25 \times 10^{-3} ##
 
You can assume that the charge on the negative line is equal in magnitude to the charge on the positive line. So, If Q is the charge on 1000 m of the positive line, then the charge on 1000 m of the negative line is -Q.

At a point halfway between the two lines, how does the magnitude of the electric field from the negative line compare to the magnitude of the electric field from the positive line?

How does the direction of the electric field from the negative line compare to the direction of the electric field from the positive line?
 
  • #10
TSny said:
You can assume that the charge on the negative line is equal in magnitude to the charge on the positive line. So, If Q is the charge on 1000 m of the positive line, then the charge on 1000 m of the negative line is -Q.

At a point halfway between the two lines, how does the magnitude of the electric field from the negative line compare to the magnitude of the electric field from the positive line?

How does the direction of the electric field from the negative line compare to the direction of the electric field from the positive line?

If I am assuming ##Q =q## then how do we get excess positive charge ?

Won't then ##E_{+ve} = 12 \times 10^6 Q## and ##E_{-ve} = -12 \times 10^6 Q##

So ##E_t = 0 ## no ?

I am a bit confused now.
 
  • #11
Buffu said:
If I am assuming ##Q =q## then how do we get excess positive charge ?
One of the power lines has a net positive charge. This net positive charge is the "excess positive charge" on that line. Likewise, the other line has "excess negative charge". The total charge of both lines together is zero. The question is asking for the excess charge on 1000 m of just the positively charged line.

Won't then ##E_{+ve} = 12 \times 10^6 Q## and ##E_{-ve} = -12 \times 10^6 Q##

So ##E_t = 0 ## no ?
Here you want to make sure to sketch a picture showing the parallel power lines and pick a point P midway between the lines. At P, draw a vector representing the electric field produced by the positively charged line. Then draw another vector at P for the electric field produced by the negatively charge line. Do the two electric field vectors at P point in the same direction or the opposite direction?
 
  • #12
TSny said:
One of the power lines has a net positive charge. This net positive charge is the "excess positive charge" on that line. Likewise, the other line has "excess negative charge". The total charge of both lines together is zero. The question is asking for the excess charge on 1000 m of just the positively charged line.Here you want to make sure to sketch a picture showing the parallel power lines and pick a point P midway between the lines. At P, draw a vector representing the electric field produced by the positively charged line. Then draw another vector at P for the electric field produced by the negatively charge line. Do the two electric field vectors at P point in the same direction or the opposite direction?
##E_{+ve} = 12\times 10^6Q (-\hat j)##
##E_{-ve} = -12\times 10^6Q (-\hat j)##
##E_{t} = 0##

afasfasc.png


No ?
 
  • #13
When you want to represent an electric field vector at a point P, the vector should be drawn with the tail of the vector at P. So, the vector representing the electric field at P due to the positively charged line should be drawn with the tail at P. Likewise for the electric field at P due to the negative power line. So, you should draw both the blue and red arrows starting on point P.

upload_2017-5-4_10-24-57.png
 
  • #14
TSny said:
When you want to represent an electric field vector at a point P, the vector should be drawn with the tail of the vector at P. So, the vector representing the electric field at P due to the positively charged line should be drawn with the tail at P. Likewise for the electric field at P due to the negative power line. So, you should draw both the blue and red arrows starting on point P.

View attachment 198649

I would still draw both red and blue arrow going downwards (in same direction).

I think I should draw them in opposite direction to get the answer but I don't know why I should do that.
 
  • #15
You are right that both arrows would point downward in the same direction. When you add those two vectors together, do the two vectors cancel to give a total field of zero?
 
  • #16
ahh, I should get a vector of double length.

##E_{t} = (-\hat j) Q \times 10^6 (12 + 12) = 24 \times 10^6 Q (-\hat j) = 15 \times 10^3 (-\hat j ) \implies 6.25 \times 10^{-4}##

Are we done ?
 
  • #17
Yes, that looks good!
 
  • #18
TSny said:
Yes, that looks good!

Gosh thank god !
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K