Infinite sum proof by induction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the infinite sum ∑_{k=1}^{∞} (6^k)/((3^k - 2^k)(3^{k+1} - 2^{k+1})). The user initially struggles to prove a key equation necessary for their induction hypothesis, specifically that 3^{n+1} - 2^{n+1} + 6^{n-1} equals (3^n - 2^n)². After realizing an error in their formulation, they correct it to (3^{n-1} - 2^{n-1})(3^{n+1} - 2^{n+1}) + 6^{n-1} = (3^n - 2^n)². With this correction, they successfully prove their hypothesis.
Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
So I am trying to solve a problem.

Evaluate \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{6^{k}}{(3^{k}-2^{k})(3^{k+1}-2^{k+1})}.

Essentially, I've boiled it down to this, but I can't quite prove it:
\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{6^{k}}{(3^{k}-2^{k})(3^{k+1}-2^{k+1})}=\frac{6(3^{n}-2^{n})}{(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1})}
and the limit of this as n approaches infinity is 2.

I need to be able to prove that 3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}+6^{n-1}=(3^{n}-2^{n})^{2} in order for my induction hypothesis to work, and I'm having trouble for some reason. Help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Doom of Doom said:
I need to be able to prove that 3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}+6^{n-1}=(3^{n}-2^{n})^{2} in order for my induction hypothesis to work, and I'm having trouble for some reason. Help?

Perhaps beacuse it isn't true, consider n=3 then

3^(3+1)-2^(3+1)+6^(3-1)=81-16+36=101
whereas
(3^3-2^3)^2=(27-8)^2=(19)^2=361
 
Wow, I'm sorry. Perhaps that's why I was unable to do it. My notes are all over the place and I guess I kind of lost track of a lot of numbers somewhere.

I meant to have (3^{n-1}-2^{n-1})(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1})+6^{n-1}=(3^{n}-2^{n})^{2}

Now I'm able to prove it! Thanks anyway.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top