Infinitely Long Magnet: Effects on Stationary Charged Particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomprice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet
AI Thread Summary
An infinitely long magnet can exert a force on a stationary charged particle when the magnet is in motion, despite the magnetic field remaining unchanged due to translational symmetry. The force acting on the particle is described by the equation F = qvB, where v is the velocity of the magnet and B is the magnetic field. This situation highlights the interplay between electric and magnetic fields as described by relativity, where a moving magnetic field can induce an electric field. The nature of this effect is tied to the concept that electric and magnetic fields are different manifestations of the same underlying phenomenon in different reference frames. Ultimately, the analysis of forces varies depending on the observer's frame, leading to different interpretations of electric and magnetic effects.
tomprice
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Ok let's say we have an infinitely long magnet, with poles arranged like in the diagram. A positively charged particle is moving as shown in the diagram. Because of Lorentz forces, the particle will be accellerated towards you. Now change the frame of reference so that the particle is stopped but the magnet is moving. Due to the translational symmetry of the magnet, the magnetic field is not changing at any point. So, what is it exactly about the magnet being moved that has any effect on the stationary charged particle?



<- NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ->
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

(charged particle moving right) o ->

THank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the magnet moves, then the magnet is doing work. That work has to be converted into another form of energy. Since your magnet is infinitly large, it's an impossible scenario because you would need the magnet to do infinite work to even move.

Also, with an infinitely large magnet, you would have an equally infinite force on the charged particle (at least, intuition tells me), or at the very least, equal to the total force within the event horizon.
 
Ok let me clarify my question.
If the magnet is stationary, no force will be exerted on the charged particle, supposing it stationary as well. (Let's ignore gravity, or suppose the magnet is massless, or something like that...)

If the magnet is moving along the axis of infinite length, a force will be exerted on the charged particle, equal to the velocity of the magnet times the magnetic field at the charged particle times the charge of the particle. (F = qvB)

Since the magnetic field is still acting just how it did with the stationary magnet (due to translational symmetry), it can't be directly responsible for this force. So, there must be some other sort of field or effect or something that is caused by the moving magnet.

What is the name of it? What is the nature of it?

The fact that it is impossible to construct the infinite magnet, or get it to move (though like I said, it doesn't take too much energy to get the charged particle moving, then just change your frame of reference...) is not relevant to the question.

Thanks again.
 
It sounds like you are interested in what a magnetic field looks like in another reference frame. Essentially, in relativity you realize that space and time are not completely independent, but are separate components of spacetime. Similarly with momentum and energy, and electric fields and magnetic fields. They are different names for the same thing as seen in specific reference frames.

That is a long-winded way of saying that as you boost a magnetic field you start to get an electric field and vice versa. Try this page for starters: http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/rel_el_mag.html
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link, it was interesting.

So does this mean that, whenever you have an electrical current flowing through a wire, the wire gets a slight negative charge due to relativistic length contraction?
 
That depends on the reference frame in which you are analyzing the situation. In some reference frame the wire is uncharged, there is no electric force, only a magnetic force. In other frames the wire will be slightly charged and so there will be an electric force. The net result is that all frames predict the same force, although they will disagree about how much is due to E and how much to B.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top