Can a magnetic field ever cause a translation motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a magnetic field can cause translational motion in charged particles or magnetic moments. Participants explore the implications of Lorentz Law, the behavior of magnetic moments in uniform and non-uniform magnetic fields, and the effects observed when materials like iron are brought near magnets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that according to Lorentz Law, if a charged particle's velocity and the magnetic field are aligned, there will be no force acting on it, suggesting that magnetic fields primarily induce rotational effects rather than translational motion.
  • Another participant proposes that a translational force can exist on a magnetic moment, expressed as ##\vec F=\nabla(\vec \mu \cdot \vec B)##.
  • Questions arise regarding the behavior of iron near a magnet, prompting further inquiry into the nature of magnetic forces.
  • Some participants express confusion about why it is commonly taught that magnetic dipoles only rotate in a field without mentioning potential translational movement after alignment.
  • A participant discusses a specific scenario involving a square loop with a current flowing through it, concluding that in a uniform magnetic field, the net force is zero, indicating no translational effect.
  • Another participant agrees that in a uniform magnetic field, the gradient of the magnetic moment and field is zero, implying no net translational force, while noting that non-uniform fields could lead to a net force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether magnetic fields can cause translational motion, with some asserting that they cannot in uniform fields, while others suggest that non-uniform fields can lead to translational forces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and scenarios, indicating a reliance on the definitions of uniform and non-uniform magnetic fields, as well as the behavior of magnetic moments. There is an acknowledgment of potential gaps in educational coverage regarding these topics.

Adesh
Messages
735
Reaction score
191
Lorentz Law says that for a charged particle moving with a velocity v in a magnetic field B then the force on it is given by $$ \mathbf{F} = q (\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}) $$
Now, if I say that particle’s velocity and the magnetic field are aligned then according to Lorentz Law there will be no force on it and hence no attraction.
If we have something that have a magnetic moment \mathbf{\mu} then the torque produced by magnetic field on it is $$ \tau = \mathbf{\mu} \times \mathbf{B}$$
So, magnetic field seems to me to work only in rotational aspects and never causes any translational effect. I want to know if this is true.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
There can be a translational force on a magnetic moment given by ##\vec F=\nabla(\vec \mu \cdot \vec B)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
Can a magnetic field ever cause a translation motion?

What happens when a piece of iron gets near a magnet?
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
I wonder where this thread will end up, thinking it might go towards the "is the magnetic field capable of doing work on matter?" way...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
Dale said:
There can be a translational force on a magnetic moment given by ##\vec F=\nabla(\vec \mu \cdot \vec B)##
But why it is taught that magnetic dipole rotates in a field and never mentions that after being aligned it will move? I mean a side of dipole going to feel a force just equal and opposite to the other side, hence translational effect is not caused.
 
Delta2 said:
I wonder where this thread will end up, thinking it might go towards the "is the magnetic field capable of doing work on matter?" way...
I quite didn’t get you.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What happens when a piece of iron gets near a magnet?
That was the real problem and because of that I asked this question.
 
With a completely uniform magnetic field in a given direction, there are no forces along the direction of the field. However, from a magnetic pole, you always get some spreading of the field lines, which means besides a ## B_z ##, you get some finite ## B_x ## and/or ## B_y ##. This same question came up a year or two ago, but I don't have that post at my fingertips. I'll try doing a "search". Yes, I found it: See https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...elds-and-magnetic-moment.875780/#post-5500177
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
Adesh said:
But why it is taught that magnetic dipole rotates in a field and never mentions that after being aligned it will move? I mean a side of dipole going to feel a force just equal and opposite to the other side, hence translational effect is not caused.
My class mentioned it. There is no translational force in a uniform B field. Perhaps your professor only got to cover uniform fields and ran out of time to cover non uniform fields in that lecture. You would have to ask the teacher why they didn’t cover it.

By the way, the magnetic moment doesn’t need to be aligned to have a force. It just can’t be perpendicular.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #10
I think I should express myself more clearly. Consider this image in attachment, in the image the red arrows represent the magnetic field B which is given by \mathbf{B} = B_0 \hat i and in the blue square loop a current I is flowing and it's direction is mentioned by the arrows in each arm. The magnetic moment \mathbf{\mu} is aligned with the field.
Now, by Laplace's equation force on each arm is $$ \mathbf{F} = I\mathcal{l} \times \mathbf{B}$$
$$ \mathbf{F_{AB}} = I (\mathbf{AB} \times \mathbf{B}) $$
$$ \mathbf{F_{AB}} = I~a~B_0 \hat j $$ we can assume that our loop is a square with all sides equal to a . Similarly, force on the arm CD is $$ \mathbf{F_{CD}} = - I~a~B_0 \hat j $$
$$ \mathbf{F_{AB}} + \mathbf{F_{CD}} = 0$$ which shows that there is no translational effect as the net force is force (we can do the similar calculations for the arms BC and AD) and the result would that \mathbf{F_{net}} = 0 which is the condition for translational equilibrium.
I request you all to please explain me through an analysis like this.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-11-28 at 4.23.02 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-11-28 at 4.23.02 PM.png
    12.8 KB · Views: 260
  • #11
Adesh said:
the magnetic field B which is given by ##B= B_0 \hat i##
Yes. Since the magnetic field is uniform ##\nabla(\vec \mu \cdot \vec B)=0##. If the field is not uniform then the forces on the different sides of the loop do not cancel out and there is a net translation force.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
  • #12
Dale said:
Yes. Since the magnetic field is uniform ##\nabla(\vec \mu \cdot \vec B)=0##. If the field is not uniform then the forces on the different sides of the loop do not cancel out and there is a net translation force.
Wow, I took a lot of time just understanding this thing. Thank you.
I just want to really thank you for replying me, if it would have been some other site or even my educational institute they would have given me everything (harsh remarks, this and that) except an answer like you did.
I’m really grateful to you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Ibix and Dale
  • #13
No worries! I am glad I could help
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Adesh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K