I have questions about the infinitesimal Lorentz transformation. but specifically about index manipulations.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}_{}_{\nu}=\delta^{\mu}_{\nu}+\delta\omega^{\mu}_{}_{\nu}[/tex]

where [tex]\delta\omega^{\mu}_{}_{\nu} << 1[/tex]

as found in many textbooks, we substitute this into

[tex]g_{\mu\nu}\Lambda^{\mu}_{}_{\alpha}\Lambda^{\nu}_{}_{\beta}=g_{\alpha\beta}[/tex]

and do the tedious(?) algebra...

[tex]g_{\mu\nu}(\delta^{\mu}_{\alpha}\delta^{\nu}_{\beta}+\delta^{\mu}_{\alpha}\delta\omega^{\nu}_{}_{\beta}+\delta\omega^{\mu}_{}_{\alpha}\delta^{\nu}_{\beta}+\delta\omega^{\mu}_{}_{\alpha}\delta\omega^{\nu}_{}_{\beta})=g_{\alpha\beta}[/tex]

and the last term is negligible because it too small (correct me if wrong!)

my question is the second and third terms. they are supposed to become...

[tex]...\delta\omega_{\mu\nu}+\delta\omega_{\nu\mu}...[/tex]

why is that? because [tex]\delta^{\mu}_{\nu}'s[/tex] are identity matrices, so whichever order we multiply, we get the same result.

and I look up some articles and found something about "abstract index notation". but is this the one?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Infinitesimal Lorentz transformation

Loading...

Similar Threads for Infinitesimal Lorentz transformation |
---|

A Transformation of a scalar field |

A Transformation of solutions of the Dirac equation |

A Angular momentum operator derived from Lorentz invariance |

A Transformation of Dirac spinors |

I CP transformation, charge conjugation and antimatter |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**