Infinitesimal surface / volume

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of infinitesimal surfaces and volumes in the context of changing coordinate systems, such as Cartesian to polar coordinates. Participants explore intuitive methods for deriving expressions for these infinitesimals, as well as the mathematical rules involved, particularly the Jacobian determinant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in remembering how to write infinitesimal surface or volume when changing coordinates and seeks an intuitive approach rather than a mathematical derivation.
  • Another participant suggests that the "rule" for infinitesimals is related to the Jacobian determinant, providing a mathematical expression for the differential of volume in terms of partial derivatives.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of the Jacobian determinant and corrects a LaTeX formatting issue in the previous post.
  • One participant offers an intuitive method by examining the dimensions of infinitesimal surfaces or volumes, explaining how to derive these in Cartesian and spherical coordinates without necessarily using the Jacobian.
  • The same participant notes that in spherical coordinates, the infinitesimal volume can be expressed in terms of the sides of the infinitesimal elements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relevance of the Jacobian determinant in deriving infinitesimals, but there is also an alternative perspective that emphasizes an intuitive understanding of the dimensions of infinitesimal elements. The discussion remains open regarding the best approach to remember and derive these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity in mathematical notation, as seen in the LaTeX corrections. There is also an implicit assumption that the participants are familiar with the concepts of differential geometry and coordinate transformations.

w.shockley
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
When i develop integrals, changing the coordinates (cartesian-> polar for example), i always forget how to write infinitesimal surface or volume.
Is there a sort of rule to derivate it?
I mean, an intuitive way to remember it, not the mathematical derivation.

(another thing: I've the same problem with the Prosthaphaeresis formulas)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean "infinitesmal surface or volume"? The differential of surface or volume?

I believe the "rule" you are referring to is the Jacobian determinant.

If u= f(x,y,z), v= g(x,y,z), w= h(x,y,z).

Then the differential of volume, is given by
[tex]dudvdw= \left|\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} \\ frac{\partial u}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial w}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} & \frac{\partial v}{\partial z} & \frac{\partial w}\end{array}\right|dxdydz[/tex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
What do you mean "infinitesmal surface or volume"? The differential of surface or volume?

I believe the "rule" you are referring to is the Jacobian determinant.

If u= f(x,y,z), v= g(x,y,z), w= h(x,y,z).

Then the differential of volume, is given by
[tex]dudvdw= \left\vert<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} \\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial w}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} & \frac{\partial v}{\partial z} & \frac{\partial w}{\partial z}\\<br /> \end{array}\right\vert dxdydz[/tex]

Fixed LaTeX in Halls post...
 
Thanks. For some reason couldn't get it to work. What was wrong?
 
The very last \frac was of \frac{\partial w}. But you forgot a denominator :frown:
 
The intuitive way to do it, is to look at the infinitesimal surface (or volume) and find out how long the sides of it are.
Typically all regular coordinate systems have an orthonormal basis at any point, which makes the infinitesimal surface a rectangle (or cube).

In cartesian an infinitesimal volume is:
[tex]dV = dx \ dy \ dz[/tex]

In spherical we have sides:
[tex]dr, \ r d\theta, \ r \sin \theta \ d\phi[/tex]

giving you an infinitesimal volume of:
[tex]dV = r^2 \sin \theta \ dr \ d\theta \ d\phi[/tex]

If you look at it like this, in general you don't need the Jacobian (which will yield exactly this result).

The boundaries of the integral are always just the boundaries, such that you integrate over the entire surface (or volume).Note that the needed absolute value of the Jacobian in spherical coordinates is:
[tex]|J| = |r^2 \sin \theta| = r^2 \sin \theta[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K