Infinitesimally small dielectric layers in a capacitor

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitch_1211
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Dielectric
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with a dielectric material whose relative permittivity varies spatially as εr = βexp(αx). Participants explore the implications of this varying permittivity on the electric displacement field (D), electric field (E), and polarization charge densities, while addressing the challenges of integrating over infinitesimally small dielectric layers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the relationship \(\overline{D} = ε_r ε_0 \overline{E}\) to derive the electric field, but notes the complication introduced by the varying permittivity.
  • Another participant suggests treating the dielectric as composed of infinitesimally small layers, leading to an integral formulation for capacitance: \(1/C = \int_0^L dx/(ε_0 ε_r(x) A)\).
  • A later reply indicates that they have derived an expression for capacitance and inquires about calculating surface and volume polarization charge densities, expressing uncertainty about the total polarization charge density being zero.
  • One participant emphasizes starting with the D vector from Gauss's law, stating that D is constant inside the capacitor and provides a method for calculating the polarization vector and charge density.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between the definitions of polarization charge density and the polarization vector, seeking clarification on the nature of the derivatives involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches to the problem, with no consensus on the total polarization charge density or the exact methods for calculating it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the varying permittivity on the overall charge densities.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the dielectric layers and the dependence on the definitions of the polarization quantities. The integration steps and the treatment of the varying permittivity are not fully resolved.

mitch_1211
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
I have a parallel plate capacitor with a dielectric inside whose relative permittivity varies as εr = βexp([itex]\alpha[/itex]x) [a theoretical calculation, I have not measured this directly]

Eventually I want to calculate the capacitance of the system. First I need to calculate the [itex]\overline{D}[/itex] field, to do this I am using [itex]\oint[/itex]S [itex]\overline{D}[/itex] . d[itex]\overline{s}[/itex] = qfree the result for a parallel plate capacitor is D = q/A with q being qfree again.

Now it can be shown that
[itex]\overline{D}[/itex] = εrε0[itex]\overline{E}[/itex] and from this [itex]\overline{E}[/itex] = D/ε0εr[*]

And this would be fine if the permittivity was constant.

My guess is to assume the dielectric is made up of many infinitesimally small dielectric's each with εr satisfying εr = βexp([itex]\alpha[/itex]x)

I know that an integral will give the sum of many infinitesimal 'pieces' but here is seems as if I have the total (which is the full dielectric) and i need to find each infinitesimal piece of dielectric such that εr = βexp([itex]\alpha[/itex]x) is satisfied for each.

Is that even possible? Will [*] then have an integral on the denominator in place of εr?

I have done a similar calculation for 2 different dielectrics, this seems an extension of this where each dielectric is infinitesimally small.

any help would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just add together the results of sheets as they would be connected as a series

1/C=Ʃ_i Δx_i/ (ε_0 ε_r(x_i) A)

Taking the limit Δx_i -> 0

[itex]1/C=\int_0^L dx/(ε_0 ε_r(x) A)[/itex]

where Δx_i is the thickness of one sheet, L is the distance between the plates and A is the area. Finally, you need to integrate the second equation and that is all.
 
Pi01 said:
Finally, you need to integrate the second equation and that is all.

Thanks a lot, I've derived an expression for the capacitance now. Any idea how i would go about calculating the surface polarisation charge density at the electrodes or the volume polarisation charge density through the dielectric?

And also i have a feeling that the total polarisation charge density is zero, however I'm not sure how i can prove this.

Thanks again :D
 
It is good to start with determining the D vector from the Gauss theorem. D is constant inside the device

D=Q/A,

where Q is the charge on the metal plate of the capacitor. Then, the electric field is

E(x)=D/( ε_0 ε_r(x) )

The polarization vector is

P(x)=ε_0 χ(x) E(x),

where χ(x)=ε_r(x)-1 is the susceptibility. Finally, the polarization charge density is given by

ρ_b(x)=-∂_x P(x)

The total polarization charge can be obtained by integrating ρ_b(x) for the total volume inside the capacitor. In my opinion that is non-zero since ε_r(x) is not the same near the two plates of the capacitor.

Good luck.
 
If i use the definition [itex]\oint[/itex]P.ds = -qpol is that the same as what you have written here?
Pi01 said:
ρ_b(x)=-∂_x P(x)

I'm not sure if that's a partial derivative or another quantity.

Is the surface polarisation charge density just the P vector?

P = χε0E

Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K