Infinity in Finite Proper Time

George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,643
Reaction score
1,601
Working on pervect's "messy unsolved" problem has led me to an interesting result. Let \left( x , t \right) be a global inertial coordinate system for Minkowski spacetime.

Consider the worldline given by

t \left( \tau \right) = \frac{\tau^3}{3} - \frac{1}{4 \tau}

x \left( \tau \right) = -\frac{\tau^3}{3} - \frac{1}{4 \tau}.

Then

\frac{dt}{d \tau} = \tau^{2} + \frac{1}{4 \tau^2}

\frac{dx}{d \tau} =- \tau^{2} + \frac{1}{4 \tau^2}.

Note that dt/d\tau > 0, and that

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \left( \frac{dt}{d \tau} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{dx}{d \tau} \right)^2 &amp;= \left( \tau^{2} + \frac{1}{4 \tau^2} \right)^2 - \left( - \tau^{2} + \frac{1}{4 \tau^2} \right)^2\\<br /> &amp; = 1.<br /> \end{align}<br />

Therefore, \tau is the proper time for a futute-directed timelike worldline.

Note also that when \tau = -1, both t and x are finite, but as \tau \rightarrow 0_-, both t and x wander off to positive infinity.

The situation is unphysical because the 4-acceleration is unbounded, although there are no hyperlight speeds.

Regards,
George

PS I think I have found an expression for the 4-acceleration of a specific example of pervect's problem, but I have to check to see if my solution really does satisfy the necessary criteria.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top