Influence of Centrifugal force in 'g'

AI Thread Summary
Centrifugal force due to Earth's rotation at the equator slightly reduces the effective gravitational acceleration ('g') experienced. This effect, while minimal—less than one percent—can influence precise measurements, such as track records. The centrifugal force alters local pressure balance and contributes to the Earth's equatorial bulge, increasing the distance to the center of the Earth. Although centrifugal force is not a real force, its effects are observable in rotating systems. Overall, the logic regarding its influence on gravitational acceleration is correct, albeit with a very small impact.
Guiga
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Influence of "Centrifugal" force in 'g'

Hello everyone,

I was wondering one of these days if the 'centrifugal' force due to the rotation of the Earth in the Equator could cause any difference in the value of the gravitational acceleration; namely it would be supposedly less than the real value because we experience it pushing us outward, in opposite direction to gravity.

I know that if it has an implication it is probably very tiny compared to the gravitational field of the Earth but I just want to know if the logic is correct.

ps. I am aware that the centrifugal force doesn't exist but we experience it; the simple rotating bucket proves it.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You're absolutely right. It is a simple calculation to perform as-well: assume you're on the equator, find the centrifugal force using the radius of the Earth and the rotational velocity (e.g. using the length of a day).
 


Yes.
And "g" values already include the contribution from centrifugal forces.
 


What's more, the centrifugal force contributes to altering the local effective g in two ways-- one way is that if you interpret yourself as being in an inertial frame (when you aren't), you need to include the "centrifugal acceleration" directly into a reduction of the locally measured g, as mentioned above. But also, this modification alters the pressure balance inside the Earth and causes the equator to bulge out a little. That increases the distance to the center, so it actually reduces the purely gravitational contribution to g (though only a little bit, less than a percent). However, it's enough to affect things like track records, when they are measured to high precision.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top