A Information and successive measurments

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Higgsono
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    information
Higgsono
Messages
93
Reaction score
4
Suppose you measure the spin of an electron along some axis, we get the result +1 with probability 0.5 and -1 with probability 0.5. The average information we receive is 1 bit of information. Now if we rotate our apparatus 90 degrees and make a new measurement, we will as before get the value +1 with probability 0.5 and -1 with probability 0.5. But now we lost the information about the spin along the direction of our first measurement. We lost 1 bit of information but gain 1 new bit of information.

So, I have a question: Does there exist a pair of noncommuting observables A,B such that if we measure A first and gain some amount of information ##I_{A}## and then make a measurement of B and gain some information ##I_{B}##. Is is possible that the new information we gained is less then the information we lose from our previous measurement. That is is it possible that ##I_{B} - I_{A} < 0##
<edit fixed latex>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is possible. Consider a two-dimensional system with the two non-commuting observables A and B. Suppose that A has eigenvalues a1 and a2, with corresponding probabilities of p1 and p2, and B has eigenvalues b1 and b2, with probabilities q1 and q2. Then if we measure A first, the average information gained is I_A = -p1log(p1) - p2log(p2). If we then measure B, the average information gained is I_B = -q1log(q1) - q2log(q2). It is possible that the difference between I_B and I_A is negative, i.e., that I_B - I_A < 0. For example, consider a system with A having eigenvalues a1 and a2 with probabilities p1 = 0.5 and p2 = 0.5, and B having eigenvalues b1 and b2 with probabilities q1 = 0.7 and q2 = 0.3. Then I_A = 1 bit and I_B = 0.88 bits, so I_B - I_A = -0.12 bits.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top