Information loss via black Holes

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
This question is about the relationship between information, entropy and heat.

I think it was in the 1970's the Hawking claimed "information is lost in black hole evaporation". This did not mean it was just inaccessible, but that it has literally disappeared, gone forever.

In the Black Hole War, Leonard Susskind 2008, pg 23 discusses when he first realized this must be wrong:
What's so bad about losing a bit of information in a balck hole? Then it dawned on us. Losing information is the same as generating entropy. The virtual black holes that Stephen had so blithly postulated would create heat in empty space. . We (estimated)..that if Stephen were right empty space would heat up to a thousand billion billion billion degrees in a tiny fraction of a second.


So assuming there IS information sitting in a black hole why is heated generated
when it evaporates? Is the existing heat with the black hole "released" beyond the event horizon and exposed so we can observe its effects...is that what Susskind is getting at?? And if so was all the "hidden stuff" necessarily so hot before it became a black hole..doesn't seem so.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
gravitational energy converted to heat energy?? hee

perhaps the things that black hole sucked in are still inside and are breaking up to form heat energy??
 
just found this old question of mine...no, there is no matter inside the event horizon..only gravitational energy...all matter is believed destroyed...compressed into sub Planck unknown form...

and by the way, I don't think entropy and heat must inevitably accopmany each other but that relationship is not at all clear to me...
 
Naty1 said:
and by the way, I don't think entropy and heat must inevitably accopmany each other but that relationship is not at all clear to me...

Entropy is the the measure of disorder in a system. So water heating up to its boiling point is an example of a system whose entropy is increasing, correct? Particles are vibrating faster and faster causing the system's entropy to increase as water to approaches its boiling point.

I can't think of anything in nature where where a system's heat increases but it's entropy does not (or vice versa).

What exactly is not clear about that relationship to you / can you provide a situation where this is not relationship is not true?

(This discussion should be moved to the General Physics Forum)?
 
Naty1 said:
So assuming there IS information sitting in a black hole why is heated generated
when it evaporates?
Where there is information there is entropy and where there is entropy there is heat.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top