Inner Ear Cooling Experiment: Non-Toxic Substance for Convection Study

  • Thread starter Thread starter THaugen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the cooling effects of substances applied to the tympanic membrane and heated with hot air, particularly in relation to a case of unexpected caloric response in a dizzy patient. An otolaryngology resident theorizes that convection from evaporation on a moist tympanic membrane could cool the inner ear, referencing literature that supports this phenomenon with perforated tympanic membranes but not intact ones. Attempts to replicate the cooling effect using a 50% rubbing alcohol and saline solution were unsuccessful. Suggestions include using 70% ethanol for its evaporative cooling properties and questioning the necessity of cooling intensity. The conversation emphasizes the need for effective non-toxic substances to achieve the desired cooling effect in the inner ear.
THaugen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question:
What substance (non-toxic and obtainable) when placed on my ear drum and heated with hot air will cause the most cooling of my inner ear through convection?

Background:
I'm an otolarngology resident and recently saw a dizzy patient who had just undergone VNG (videonystagmography). This patient had a caloric response that was opposite of what was expected. Warm air stimulated nystagmus beating to the oppose side instead of the same side. I examined the patient's ear under the microscope and his tympanic membrane was very inflamed and moist. I theorized that convection from the evaporation that occurred as warm air was blowing across his moist tympanic membrane actually cooled his horizontal semicircular canal. I looked up some literature and this effect (I believe the physics term is convection?) has been shown to occur with perforated TM's but never with an intact TM. I tried to replicate this in our balance lab with a 50% rubbing alcohol and 50% normal saline solution of my tympanic membrane but failed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a reason you used warm air instead of cool? Wouldn't cool air cool off the eardrum better?
 
THaugen said:
Question:
What substance (non-toxic and obtainable) when placed on my ear drum and heated with hot air will cause the most cooling of my inner ear through convection?

Background:
I'm an otolarngology resident and recently saw a dizzy patient who had just undergone VNG (videonystagmography). This patient had a caloric response that was opposite of what was expected. Warm air stimulated nystagmus beating to the oppose side instead of the same side. I examined the patient's ear under the microscope and his tympanic membrane was very inflamed and moist. I theorized that convection from the evaporation that occurred as warm air was blowing across his moist tympanic membrane actually cooled his horizontal semicircular canal. I looked up some literature and this effect (I believe the physics term is convection?) has been shown to occur with perforated TM's but never with an intact TM. I tried to replicate this in our balance lab with a 50% rubbing alcohol and 50% normal saline solution of my tympanic membrane but failed.

IIRC, otholith repositioning procedures commonly use warm saline flushes to create flow in the inner ear. The effect could be similar to what you observed.

Your idea to use alcohol was a good one, that will also cool the tympanic membrane due to evaporation- can you use 70% EtOH? How much cooling do you think you need?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top