Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the calibration intervals for laboratory instruments such as digital multimeters (DMMs) and oscilloscopes, specifically questioning the standard one-year interval and the concept of self-calibration using higher accuracy bench DMMs. Participants explore the acceptance of self-calibration in various industries and the implications of calibration practices.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question why the calibration interval is set to one year instead of two years, suggesting it may be a tradeoff between frequency and cost.
- It is noted that calibration typically requires high precision equipment, which can be expensive, leading to the need for certified calibration labs.
- Some participants propose the idea of self-calibration using a calibrated bench DMM, questioning if this practice is accepted in the industry.
- One participant mentions that the acceptability of self-calibration depends on specific industry needs and circumstances, indicating that some applications may not require stringent accuracy.
- Another participant shares their experience as a calibration technician, highlighting the importance of traceability and the use of "in house standards" for calibrating other instruments.
- References to regulatory requirements from the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) emphasize the importance of calibration procedures and traceability to international standards.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the necessity and acceptance of self-calibration in the industry. While some argue that it is generally not accepted due to the need for certified calibration, others suggest that it may be sufficient in certain contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the general acceptance of self-calibration practices.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight that calibration requirements can vary significantly by industry and application, and that specific circumstances may dictate the appropriateness of self-calibration. There is an emphasis on the importance of traceability in calibration practices.