Integer Arithmetic for Precise Calculation of Irrational Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the author's exploration of integer arithmetic for precise calculation of irrational numbers, specifically focusing on methods of computing PI. The author has developed software that documents these methods but seeks feedback on its usefulness and direction for further development. The consensus is that the material is valuable for those interested in the history of PI, though it may require simplification for a general audience. Additionally, the concept of maintaining sub-expressions as prime factorizations is recognized as a promising area for further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integer arithmetic and its applications in computing.
  • Familiarity with the history and computation methods of PI.
  • Basic knowledge of software development and documentation practices.
  • Concepts of prime factorization in mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced methods for computing PI using integer arithmetic.
  • Explore the implications of prime factorization in mathematical computations.
  • Connect with mathematicians and software developers for collaborative projects.
  • Investigate audience-specific documentation strategies for technical publications.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, software developers, and educators interested in the computational aspects of irrational numbers and the historical context of PI.

spydrcom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have authored documents of 40 years of computer software development with a mind to collect them into a publication at some point. They have been built around several software topics but mathemetics is a favorite of mine. I find a point of inspiration and write a piece of software around it and document that process.

The attached 5 page PDF is one such effort inspired by a book on the history of PI. The software has been coded and shows methods of computation of PI. I hit a bit of brick wall forming conclusions at the end of the piece.

The questions are:

1) Is this material useful or is it simplistic and redundant being better addressed in other forms of documentation?

2) It seems there should be a good direction to go with the sub-expressions being maintained as prime factorizations, does this resonate with someone who would like to discuss this further and perhaps help find a next level?

Any and all feedback welcome
 

Attachments

Technology news on Phys.org

Thank you for sharing your work and seeking feedback from fellow scientists. I can appreciate your passion for mathematics and software development. Here are my thoughts on your questions:

1) I believe your material can be useful, especially for those interested in the history of PI and its methods of computation. The fact that you have coded the software and documented the process adds value to your work. However, it would be helpful to know your target audience and the purpose of your publication. If it is meant for a general audience, it may be beneficial to simplify some technical terms and provide more context for those not familiar with the subject. If it is for a more specialized audience, your material may be better addressed in a more technical form.

2) Your idea of maintaining sub-expressions as prime factorizations is intriguing and could potentially lead to further exploration and development. I would suggest reaching out to other mathematicians or software developers who have expertise in this area to discuss and collaborate on potential next steps. Networking and exchanging ideas with others in your field can often lead to new insights and advancements.

Overall, I commend your dedication and hard work in this project and I wish you all the best in your future endeavors. Keep pushing the boundaries and seeking feedback from others in your field to continue improving and expanding your work. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K