Integral 1/x^(2/3)dx from -1 to 1: Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter miglo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the improper integral of the function 1/x^(2/3) from -1 to 1, with participants exploring the nature of the function and its antiderivative. The context includes considerations of even and odd functions and the implications for integration limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss splitting the integral into two parts and taking limits as they approach zero. There is also a consideration of the function's evenness and how that affects the integration process. Questions arise regarding the handling of improper integrals and the necessity of certain limits.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights about the properties of the function and questioning the original poster's approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of even functions and the setup of improper integrals.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential confusion regarding the evaluation of limits and the nature of the function at certain points, particularly concerning the cube root of negative numbers and the relevance of specific integration limits.

miglo
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


integral 1/x^(2/3)dx from -1 to 1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


so i split it up into two integrals, one with limits going from -1 to b and the other with limits going from c to 1, and taking the limits as b and c go to 0
i know my antiderivative is 3x^(1/3) and i plugged in my limits of integration and then took the limit as both b and c went to 0 and i got an answer of 3-3(-1)^(1/3) i know this is wrong simply because the cube root of -1 will be give me a complex number but i tried it on wolfram alpha and it gave me the same answer. i looked at the back of my book and it says the answer is 6, i don't understand how the book got an answer of 6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wolfram Alpha is wrong and so is plugging into the antiderivative (which it's likely WA did) for an improper integral. 1/x^(2/3) is actually an even function if you take it to be (1/x^(1/3))^2, isn't it? That should mean you can take the improper integral over (0,1] and double it. What's that integral? BTW (-1)^(1/3) is not necessarily a complex number.
 
Last edited:
ohh thanks! ill watch out for even and odd functions

one more quick question though
i have another improper integral, its 2dx/(x^2-1) from -infinity to -2
so i broke it up into two integrals, the first one has limits from a to -1 with the limit as a approaches -infinity and the second is from -1 to -2
am i doing this right?
 
miglo said:
ohh thanks! ill watch out for even and odd functions

one more quick question though
i have another improper integral, its 2dx/(x^2-1) from -infinity to -2
so i broke it up into two integrals, the first one has limits from a to -1 with the limit as a approaches -infinity and the second is from -1 to -2
am i doing this right?

Why do you need the integral from -1 to -2? -1 isn't in (-infinity,-2). There's no need to break it there. Just integrate from a to -2.
 
ohh alright
thanks again
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
16K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K