Integral calculus: integral variable substitution confusion

Click For Summary
Integral calculus involves techniques like variable substitution to simplify integrals, such as transforming \(\int \sqrt{x+2}dx\) into \(\int u^{1/2}du\) by letting \(u = x + 2\). The confusion arises when applying this to more complex integrals, like \(\int 2x\sqrt{4x-3}dx\), where the substitution \(u = 4x - 3\) leads to \(du = 4dx\). This step is crucial for correctly adjusting the differential during integration. While some may argue against treating derivatives as fractions, this approach is commonly accepted in integration techniques. Understanding these substitutions is essential for solving more complex calculus problems effectively.
thegreengineer
Messages
54
Reaction score
3
Recently I started seeing integral calculus and right now we are covering the topic of the antiderivative. At first sign it was not very difficult, until we started seeing integral variable substitution. The problem starts right here:
Let's suppose that we have a function like this:

\int \sqrt{x+2}dx

We can easily convert that \sqrt{x+2} into a (x+2)^{1/2}. However we cannot expand this polynomial to a fractional power so instead we rename x+2 as u so x+2=u and dx would become into du. Having this we can redefine the integral to have something as this:

\int u^{1/2}du

Now we can use the power rule to solve this integral:

\frac{2}{3}u^{3/2}+C

The only thing we now have to do is to express the solution in terms of x so we have that:

\frac{2}{3}(x+2)^{3/2}+C

And this was just the beginning; later on we saw more difficult examples involving trigonometric functions. My main doubt focuses on what my math teacher did in class.

We started having this another integral:

\int 2x\sqrt{4x-3}dx

It's a very similar problem like the previous one, now having a factor multiplying a square root. Following the similar algorithm for the last case I replaced the whole expression 4x-3 into u and to express the remaining x in terms of u I only isolated for x in the u. However what my teacher did to find du was equalling it to 4dx and that's where I don't understand why instead of du=dx he did that. I hope someone can answer me this to solve my homework problems. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The substitution was ##u = 4x - 3## and hence ##\frac{du}{dx} = 4##. Your teacher is then rearranging to get ##du = 4 \, dx##
(I personally don't like this method, the derivative is not a fraction of du divided by dx).
 
  • Like
Likes thegreengineer
pwsnafu said:
The substitution was ##u = 4x - 3## and hence ##\frac{du}{dx} = 4##. Your teacher is then rearranging to get ##du = 4 \, dx##
(I personally don't like this method, the derivative is not a fraction of du divided by dx).
I agree that technically du/dx is not a fraction, but most of the time it does no harm to treat it as if it were. This sort of arithmetic is done all the time in integration substitutions, including trig substitutions, as well as in integration by parts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K