Integral equation for large surfaces

Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
We often neglect the terms of a surface integral ##\int_v(\nabla•A)dv=\int_s(A•ds)## for ##s## to be very large or ##v## to be very large,
What is actually the reason behind this to neglect??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field ##\vec A## is assumed to go to zero at infinity at a rate faster than the rate at which the surface grows.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Dale and Apashanka
Orodruin said:
The field ##\vec A## is assumed to go to zero at infinity at a rate faster than the rate at which the surface grows.
Okk got it ...thanks @Orodruin
 
Orodruin said:
The field ##\vec A## is assumed to go to zero at infinity at a rate faster than the rate at which the surface grows.
But if the rate at which the vector field ##A## goes to zero at infinity is slower than the rate at which the surface grows ,then also it would be zero ,isn't it??
 
No. You need the assumption of the field going to zero fast enough. Take the example of the field of a single point charge.
 
Orodruin said:
No. You need the assumption of the field going to zero fast enough. Take the example of the field of a single point charge.
Ok the field decreses as ##\frac{1}{r^2}## and the spherical surface element centered at the point charge grows as ##r^2sin\theta d\theta d\phi##
 
Apashanka said:
Ok the field decreses as ##\frac{1}{r^2}## and the spherical surface element centered at the point charge grows as ##r^2sin\theta d\theta d\phi##
And so the integral is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Apashanka

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K