Integral equation to solve with La Place transformation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral equation y(t) + 2∫₀ᵗ cos(t-τ)y(τ)dτ = 9e²ᵗ can be solved using the Laplace transform. The initial attempt involved differentiating the equation and assuming y(0) = 0, leading to the transformed equation Sy(s) + 2y(s) = 18/(s-2) - s/(s²+1). However, the approach was flawed due to misinterpretation of the convolution integral. The correct method involves recognizing that convolution in the time domain corresponds to multiplication in the Laplace domain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral equations
  • Familiarity with the Laplace transform
  • Knowledge of convolution integrals
  • Basic differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of convolution integrals in the context of Laplace transforms
  • Learn how to apply the inverse Laplace transform to solve differential equations
  • Explore examples of solving integral equations using Laplace transforms
  • Review the concept of initial conditions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians working with integral equations, and anyone interested in applying Laplace transforms to solve complex mathematical problems.

Funzies
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


y(t)+2\int_0^tcos(t-\tau)y(\tau)d\tau = 9e^{2t}
Solve this integral equation by using the La Place transform.

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried differentiation the whole equation:
y'(t) + 2cos(t-\tau)y(\tau) = 18e^{2t} with boundaries 0 and t
y'(t) + 2y(t) +cos(t)y(0) = 18e^{2t}
The exercise didn't give a value for y(0), so I assumed it to be zero.
y'(t) + 2y(t) = 18e^{2t} - cos(t)
By using the La Place transform:
Sy(s) + 2y(s) = 18/(s-2) - s/(s^2+1)
y(s) = \18/(s-2)(s+2) - s/(s^2+1)(s+2)
This is were I started doubting my approach. I tried to rewrite it in 3 fractions and wanted to use the inverse la Place transform on these fractions. I got some very nasty numbers though and as the answer is very straight-forward I started doubting my approach. Can anyone comment on the correctness of my approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your approach is the best way, and even if it is viable, I think I see a few mistakes in there, looking quickly.

I recommend dealing with the equation directly. Note that the integral is a convolution integral, which is different than a standard integral. Now think about the property that convolution in the time domain is equivalent to multiplication in the Laplace domain.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K