MHB Integral of Exponential Fractions with Positive Parameters

polygamma
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Show that for positive parameters $a$, $b$, and $c$,

$$ \int_{0}^{\infty} \left( \frac{e^{-ax}-e^{-bx}}{x^{2}} + (a-b) \frac{e^{-cx}}{x} \ \right) \ dx = b-a + a \ln \left(\frac{a}{c} \right) - b \ln \left(\frac{b}{c} \right)$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]

$$ F = \int_{0}^{\infty} \left( \frac{e^{-ax}-e^{-bx}}{x^{2}} + (a-b) \frac{e^{-cx}}{x} \ \right) \ dx$$

$$F_a =\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-cx}-e^{-ax}}{x}\ dx = \ln \left( \frac{a}{c}\right) $$

$$F= a \ln \left( \frac{a}{c}\right) - a + C $$

$$F_b = C_b$$

$$F_b = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-bx}-e^{-cx}}{x} dx = -\ln \left( \frac{b}{c}\right)$$

We have $$C_b = -\ln \left( \frac{b}{c}\right)$$ so

$$C = -b\ln \left( \frac{b}{c}\right)+b$$

$$F = b-a +a \ln \left( \frac{a}{c}\right)-b\ln \left( \frac{b}{c}\right)$$

[/sp]
 
@ Zaid

I actually didn't even consider differentiating inside of the integral.

I took the boring approach of finding an antiderivative in terms of the exponential integral and then using the expansion of the exponential integral at $x=0$ to evaluate the antiderivative at the lower limit.

There is one thing about your evaluation that I'm not sure about, though.

When you integrated to find the constant $C$, how did you know that he constant of integration was zero?

Alternatively what you could do to find $C$ is to let $a=b$ in the original integral.
 
Random Variable said:
There is one thing about your evaluation that I'm not sure about, though.

When you integrated to find the constant $C$, how did you know that he constant of integration was zero?

Alternatively what you could do to find $C$ is to let $a=b$ in the original integral.

Yeah, I made the evaluations not clear but I actually considered that $C$ as a function of $b$ so I differentiated with respect to $b$. Again putting $a=b$ is by far much clearer.

Can you post your approach ?
 
It's easier to work the upper incomplete gamma function.

\Gamma(0,a x) = -\text{Ei}(- ax) = \int_{ax}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-t}}{t} \ dt = \int_{x}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-au}}{u} \ duLet's first derive the expansion at $x=0$.

$$ \Gamma(0,x) = \int_{x}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-t}}{t} \ dt = \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-t}}{t} \ dt - \int_{1}^{x} \frac{e^{-t}}{t} \ dt $$

$$ = \int_{1}^{x} \frac{1-e^{-t}}{t} \ dt - \ln x + \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-t}}{t} \ dt$$

$$= -\ln x + \Big( -\int_{0}^{1} \frac{1-e^{-t}}{t} \ dt + \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-t}}{t} \ dt \Big) + \int_{0}^{x} \frac{1-e^{-t}}{t} \ dt$$

$$ = - \ln x - \gamma - \int_{0}^{x} \frac{e^{-t}-1}{t} \ dt$$

$$ = - \ln x - \gamma \int_{0}^{x} \Big(-1 + \frac{t}{2} - \frac{t^{2}}{6} + \ldots \Big) \ dt$$

$$ = - \ln x - \gamma + x + \mathcal{O}(x^{2}) $$And it's not really needed here, but one can find an asymptotic expansion at $x= \infty$ by integrating by parts.

$$ \Gamma(0,x) \sim \frac{e^{-x}}{x} + \mathcal{O}\left( \frac{e^{-x}}{x^{2}} \right) \ \ x \to \infty$$Then

$$ \int \left( \frac{e^{-ax}-e^{-bx}}{x^{2}} + (a-b) \frac{e^{-cx}}{x} \ \right) \ dx = \int \frac{e^{-ax}-e^{-bx}}{x^{2}} \ dx + (a-b) \int \frac{e^{-cx}}{x} \ dx$$

$$ = -\frac{e^{-ax} -e^{-bx}}{x} + \int \frac{-ae^{-ax}+be^{-bx}}{x} \ dx -(a-b) \Gamma(0,cx)$$

$$ = \frac{e^{-bx} -e^{-ax}}{x} + a \Gamma(0,ax) - b \Gamma(0,bx) - (a-b) \Gamma(0,cx)+C$$$$ \int^{\infty}_{0} \left( \frac{e^{-ax}-e^{-bx}}{x^{2}} + (a-b) \frac{e^{-cx}}{x} \ \right) \ dx$$

$$ = 0 - \lim_{x \to 0} \left[ \frac{e^{-bx} -e^{-ax}}{x} + a \left(-\ln ax - \gamma \right) - b \left(-\ln bx - \gamma \right) -(a-b) \left(-\ln cx - \gamma \right) \right]$$

$$= - \lim_{x \to 0} \left[ \frac{e^{-bx} -e^{-ax}}{x} - a \ln \left(\frac{a}{c} \right) + b \left(\frac{b}{c} \right) \right]$$

$$ = b-a + a \ln \left(\frac{a}{c} \right) - b \ln \left(\frac{b}{c} \right) $$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top