Integral of (x-sinx)/x^3 (contour integration)

Click For Summary
The integral of (x - sin(x))/x^3 from negative to positive infinity evaluates to pi/2 using contour integration. The discussion revolves around the choice of contour, specifically whether to use a semicircle with a bump, and the implications of the residue at the origin being zero. Jordan's lemma is applied to show that the contribution from the large radius goes to zero. The method involves deforming the contour to avoid the origin and splitting the integral into parts, with sin(z) replaced by its exponential form for further analysis. Ultimately, the contour must be closed appropriately to account for the exponential decay in different planes.
Jerbearrrrrr
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
The problem is \int _{-\infty}^\infty \frac{x-sinx}{x^3} dx
The answer is pi/2.
Contour integration is to be used.

Here are my questions about the method:

Is the contour a semicircle with a bump?

There is no z^-1 term in the expansion, so the residue at the origin is zero?

Jordan's lemma=> large radius contribution ->0?

So where does the actual contribution come from?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are given an integral like this which you want to do using contour integration, then the first step could be to write down some meromorphic function of which the integral from minus to plus infinity will allow you to extract the value of the desired integral. Only then do you think about the details of a contour in order to compute that integral.

Now, you do already know in advance that whatever contour you will need will extend to infinity. This then gives you a clue on how to choose the meromorphic function; sin(z) cannot appear in the integrand of any contour integral, as |sin(z)| will increase exponentially.

Now, you probably know that in case of the integral of sin(x)/x you end up with replacing
sin(x) by exp(ix) and then you consider the principal value of the integral and take the imaginary part.

In this case, you can proceed as follows. You want to split up the integral in two parts, one containing 1/x^2 the other containing sin(x)/x^3, but that won't work because neither integral converges. You also cannot take the principal part, because they don't converge either. But what you can do is deform the integration contour to bypass the origin firstusing a half circle of radius epsilon containg the origin. After you do that you can split up the integral in the two parts.

You can then replace sin(z) by 1/(2i) [exp(i z) - exp(-iz)] and split that part of the integral further in two. The contour of each part then has to be closed in a different way because |exp(iz)| decays exponentially in the upper half plane while |exp(-iz)| decays exponentially in the lower half plane.
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K