Integral that I have been trying to solve

  • Thread starter Thread starter yanic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an integral that the original poster has been attempting to solve. The problem appears to involve trigonometric functions, specifically sine, and may relate to elliptical integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential use of substitution, particularly with sin(x), while some express skepticism about its effectiveness. There are hints about rewriting parts of the integral, but questions arise regarding the implications of these rewrites. The nature of the integral is questioned, with references to its non-integrability in elementary functions and the relevance of elliptical integrals.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various approaches and questioning the assumptions made about the integral's solvability. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of special functions, but there is no explicit consensus on the best path forward.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the integral may not be solvable using elementary functions, and participants are considering the implications of this, including the behavior of the expression under certain conditions.

yanic
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Please check the attached file.
It's an integral that I have been trying to solve for a while.

I hope that I have been enough specific.


Regards
 

Attachments

  • integral.JPG
    integral.JPG
    28.8 KB · Views: 524
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know substitution?
sin(x)=u is a possible approach, and that method might work as well.

The first part is easy to integrate, just ignore it for now and focus on the fraction.

As this is a homework-like question, I moved your thread to our homework section.
 
mfb said:
Do you know substitution?
sin(x)=u is a possible approach, and that method might work as well.
Substitution won't help much here. This is not integrable in the elementary functions. Ignoring the first part, which is easy, the result is a constant times the difference between an elliptical integral of the first kind and an elliptical integral of the second kind.
 
Hint: Rewrite the numerator ##-\sin^2(x)## as ##c-(\sin^2(x)+c)##.
 
D H said:
Hint: Rewrite the numerator ##-\sin^2(x)## as ##c-(\sin^2(x)+c)##.

Hi,
The numerator is a square root. I can't see how rewriting the numerator in such a way
will lead me to the expected result.
Please can you give further indications?
 
D H said:
Substitution won't help much here. This is not integrable in the elementary functions. Ignoring the first part, which is easy, the result is a constant times the difference between an elliptical integral of the first kind and an elliptical integral of the second kind.

Hello,
I totally agree with you. Substitution in such a way won't work and the equation has nothing to do
with homework. I am trying to figure out a Mathematical model and I need to solve this part of the entire expression.

Regard
 
yanic said:
Hi,
The numerator is a square root. I can't see how rewriting the numerator in such a way
will lead me to the expected result.
Please can you give further indications?
The *denominator* is a square root. The *numerator* is -sin(x)2.
 
D H said:
The *denominator* is a square root. The *numerator* is -sin(x)2.

Sorry
Yeah I see. I have tried but that won't help either.
DId you get any result with that substitution?
The problem is the last term of the integration by part
that always contains at the denominator √([sin]^{2}(x)+c)
 
yanic said:
Sorry
Yeah I see. I have tried but that won't help either.
DId you get any result with that substitution?
The problem is the last term of the integration by part
that always contains at the denominator √([sin]^{2}(x)+c)
Did you read my first post? You can try all the substitutions you want and you will *never* be able to find an analytic solution to this problem in the elementary functions. This problem is not integrable in the elementary functions. Fortunately, there are two special functions that are very applicable to this problem, the elliptical integrals of the first and second kind. The standard definitions of these functions are

[tex]\begin{aligned}<br /> F(\phi,k) &= \int_0^{\phi} \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{1-k^2\sin^2(\theta)}} \\<br /> E(\phi,k) &= \int_0^{\phi} \sqrt{1-k^2\sin^2(\theta)} \, d\theta<br /> \end{aligned}[/tex]
Here, k is the "elliptic modulus" and must lie between 0 and 1. The restriction is reduced if we substitute k2 with m:

[tex]\begin{aligned}<br /> F(\phi;m) &= \int_0^{\phi} \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{1-m\sin^2(\theta)}} \\<br /> E(\phi;m) &= \int_0^{\phi} \sqrt{1-m\sin^2(\theta)} \, d\theta<br /> \end{aligned}[/tex]
Your integral, with appropriate modifications, can be made to look very much like these latter forms.

So what's the point? Simple: You can find mathematical tables the list these elliptical integrals and software that implements them.
 
  • #10
And what exactly you're going to do with it once you get it yanac? Now I don't want to get in D.H. way since I think he's doing a great job explaining to me and you how to solve this thing but seems to me there is more to it for example what happens when the expression in the root becomes negative or how exactly can I use those special functions to actually solve an integral and they do agree with numerical calculation right? Might want to check. Even if [itex]1-m\sin^2(t)<0[/itex]? I'm not rightly sure. Just saying that's all.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K