Integrate over all values of a vector

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ionophore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a function involving a Dirac delta function over a two-dimensional vector space. Participants explore the notation and the conversion of the integral into spherical polar coordinates, while addressing the implications of the vector nature of the integrand.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on integrating a function involving a Dirac delta function and expresses confusion over the notation used, particularly regarding the vector \overline{r} and its magnitude.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the notation, specifically whether L is a vector or a scalar, and suggests that the integral should yield a vector result.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the integral, with one participant confirming it is a double integral and asking for clarification on the notation used for the components and differentials.
  • One participant explains that a single integral over a two-dimensional region can be computed as a double integral, referencing multivariable calculus principles.
  • Another participant provides a reformulation of the integral in Cartesian coordinates and discusses the implications of the vector nature of the integrand.
  • There is a suggestion that the integral could also be expressed in polar coordinates, with a note on the importance of choosing the appropriate coordinate system based on the symmetry of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and clarity regarding the notation and the integration process. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the integral or the best approach to take, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential ambiguities in notation and the need for clarity regarding the vector nature of the integrand and the use of the Dirac delta function. The discussion also touches on the choice of coordinate systems for integration, which may depend on the specific problem context.

Ionophore
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is probably a really simple question, but I think that I am getting lost in notation. I want to integrate the following over all values of the (2-dimensional) vector \overline{r}:

<br /> \int_{\overline{r}} \frac{\delta(\abs{\overline{r}-L})}{2\pi L} \overline{r} d\overline{r}<br />

Basically, I want to integrate over all space. I think that the way to proceed is to convert to spherical polar coordinates but I'm not really sure how.

Edit
... delta is a dirac delta function. Sorry I didn't specify that before... maybe it's adding unnecessary complexity to my question. All i really want to know is how to deal with the \overline{r} out front.

Thank you,

-ben
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is also sloppy. For example, is L a vector, or did you mean
\delta(|\vec r| - L)
(the delta restricting the length of r?)

Also, should the integral produce again a vector v? Then basically, it says<br /> v_i = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\delta(r_1^2 + r_2^2 - L)}{2\pi L} r_i \, dr_1 dr_2<br />

where v_i denotes the i-th component.
 
Whoops, I'm sorry, I did mean magnitude:

<br /> \int_{\vec{r}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} \vec{r} d\vec{r}<br />

So, then, I am to understand that the above is really a double integral? What is meant by r_i, dr_1 and dr_2?
 
Ionophore said:
So, then, I am to understand that the above is really a double integral?
One of the basic theorems of multivariable calculus is that a single integral over a two-dimensional region can be computed by a double integral, each over one-dimensional regions. (And similarly for higher-dimensional regions) Surely you've done such things before? e.g. integrating density over a three-dimensional region to calculate mass?

I assume the same ideas would hold for multivariate distributions. (so that it would be valid with a Dirac delta distribution)

Incidentally, it looks much easier in Cartesian coordinates. By the way, did you mean \delta^2 instead of \delta?
 
So:

<br /> \int_{\vec{r}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} \vec{r} d\vec{r}<br /> <br /> = \int_{r_{x}} \int_{r_{y}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} r_{x}r_{y}dr_{x}dr_{y}<br />

Where r_{x} and r_{y} are the components of \vec{r}, and the integrations extend from -infinity -> infinity. I think I see.

Thanks everyone,

-ben

Edit:
And yes, of course, I have "done" this before, but that intermediate step is never shown, and so I just sort of memorized the general idea without really understanding it.
 
Almost. Note that there is a vector \vec r in the integrand. So either you will calculate a vector, that is:
\vec I = \int_{r_{x}} \int_{r_{y}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} \vec r dr_{x}dr_{y}
meaning
I_x = \int_{r_{x}} \int_{r_{y}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} r_x dr_{x}dr_{y}
and
I_y = \int_{r_{x}} \int_{r_{y}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} r_y dr_{x}dr_{y}.
Or, you are still forgetting some absolute value, and you actually mean
\int_{r_{x}} \int_{r_{y}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} |\vec r| dr_{x}dr_{y} = \int_{r_{x}} \int_{r_{y}} \frac{\delta(\abs{|\vec{r}|-L})}{2\pi L} \sqrt{r_x^2 + r_y^2} dr_{x}dr_{y}.

Also, since you mentioned something about polar coordinates: note that this is just one way to write the integral. This is what we usually do, because we are used to think about (x, y) Cartesian coordinates in the plane. However, you can also go to polar coordinates (r, \theta), then your integral would read (assuming you meant |r| instead of r-vector in the integrand):
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{\delta(\abs{r-L})}{2\pi L} r \times r \, dr d\theta
(check that!). It looks different, but note that there are still two integrals which need to be done. Which coordinates you want to use is up to you, and is often dictated by some (usually physical) principle such as a symmetry; for example if you have rotation invariance (the integrand only depends on |\vec r| = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} it is much easier to use polar coordinates), if your integrand is x^2 you would be better of using Cartesian coordinates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K