I Integrate time dilation with derivative

Franyer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need to integrate time dilation with derivative, how could I do that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Franyer said:
I need to integrate time dilation with derivative, how could I do that?
Without knowing the problem you're trying to analyze it's hard to answer with any certainty... But the chances are very good that you will be better off abandoning the time dilation formula and working with the more general Lorentz transformations.
The time dilation formula is a special case of the Lorentz transformations, and applicable only under very limited circumstances.

But tell us more about what you're trying to do and you'll get better and more helpful answer.
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
386
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top