Integrating (1/(1+e^x)) dx: Challenges and Solutions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter niyati
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx Integrating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of (1/(1+e^x)) dx, exploring various methods for solving it, including substitution and partial fractions. Participants share their approaches, challenges, and corrections related to the integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about using u substitution for the integral.
  • Another suggests using the substitution u = 1 + e^x, leading to a discussion on the implications of this substitution.
  • Concerns are raised about balancing the differential when using the substitution, with some participants suggesting alternative methods to simplify the integral.
  • Multiple participants propose multiplying by e^-x or e^x to facilitate the substitution process, with varying opinions on the necessity of this step.
  • There is a contention over whether partial fractions are necessary, with some arguing that they are unavoidable while others claim they can be bypassed.
  • Disagreement arises regarding the correctness of certain integration results and the derivatives of logarithmic expressions, with participants challenging each other's calculations.
  • A participant provides a numerical approximation for the integral, which prompts further debate about the correctness of previous claims.
  • Humor is injected into the conversation as participants reflect on the collaborative nature of solving the integral problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the integral, with multiple competing views and approaches remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the application of logarithmic integration rules and the necessity of partial fractions, indicating potential misunderstandings or missing steps in their reasoning.

  • #31
Are you differentiating \ln(u^2 -u) wrt "x" or to "u" ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
opps I meant to type d/du
 
  • #33
camilus said:
\int{1 \over u^2-u}du = ln(u^2-u) + C
Why would you think that?



p.s. have you looked at your private messages?
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Lol jesus how many mathematicians does it take to solve an exponential integral problem?

I'm not calling anyone stupid, but just found it funny ya'll are being cooperative to solve this
 
  • #36
Solve a man's integral problem, and he gets one answer. Teach a man how to solve integral problems, and he gets all of his homework done. :-p (and without cheating)
 
Last edited:
  • #37
Hurkyl said:
Solve a man's integral problem, and he gets one answer. Teach a man how to solve integral problems, and he gets all of his homework done. :-p (and without cheating)

(APPLAUSE) Well Said!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K