Integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on integrating a function involving the complex conjugate of a variable, specifically the integral ∫ sin(x*) dx, where x* denotes the complex conjugate of x. Participants clarify that x is a complex variable and that the function sin(conjugate(z)) is not holomorphic, indicating it lacks a complex anti-derivative, which necessitates numerical integration. The conversation also touches on the importance of determining whether the integral is definite or indefinite, and the need for a suitable path for integration in the complex plane. Additionally, the Cauchy-Riemann equations are referenced to establish conditions for holomorphic functions, emphasizing the role of derivatives with respect to the conjugate variable. Overall, the integration of functions involving complex conjugates requires careful consideration of their properties and potential numerical methods.
HilbertSpace
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The reason I ask the aforementioned question is because I came across the expectation values of operators in Quantum Mechanics. And part of the computation involves integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx.

So as an example let's say I have:

∫ sin (x*) dx where the * denotes the complex conjugate.

How would I do it? (I would post an attempt to solve it but I have no idea whether to even treat the x* as a constant, or variable or...something).Thank you in advance for any help you may provide.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is x a complex variable, then?
 
Yes, x is a complex variable.
 
If your x is just real or imaginary conjugate(x) = x or conjugate(x) = -x and so integration can be performed pretty easily.

I don't believe the function sin(conjugate(z)) is holomorphic so it won't end up having a complex anti-derivative.

This mean that numerical integration will be needed.
 
Is it a definite or indefinite integral?

If it is definite, what path would you like to use? A complex integral can be looked at as a path integral in the plane, for which a parametrization might make it feasible to calculate exactly.

But like Skrew said, this does not look amenable to methods from complex analysis like computing residues.
 
Skrew said:
If your x is just real or imaginary conjugate(x) = x or conjugate(x) = -x and so integration can be performed pretty easily.

I don't believe the function sin(conjugate(z)) is holomorphic so it won't end up having a complex anti-derivative.

This mean that numerical integration will be needed.

IN Fact holomorphic depends on the derivative wrt z* to be zero
 
Mandlebra said:
IN Fact holomorphic depends on the derivative wrt z* to be zero

I'm not well versed on different approaches but my book defines d/dz and d/d(conjugate(z)) to be such that the cauchy Riemman equations are satisified IFF d/d(conjugate(z)) = 0, at which point the definition of the derivative can be applied and the limit exists.

Is there another way to look at this using the difference quotient of conjugate(z)?
 
Some insight may be gained by considering the integral over a path P consisting of a straight line segment at angle θ to the real axis:
\int_{P}f(z).d\overline{z} = e^{2i\theta} \int_{P}f(z).dz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K