Integrating a Vector Modulus: Dealing with Square Roots in Exponential Form

Click For Summary
The integral in question involves the expression \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-a| \vec{r}|}e^{-\vec{b} \cdot \vec{r}}}{|\vec{r}|}\), where the challenge lies in handling the square root in the exponential. The discussion suggests using spherical coordinates to simplify the integration process, particularly for the \(\vec{b} \cdot \vec{r}\) term, which can become complex. By choosing a coordinate system where the vector \(\vec{b}\) is aligned along the z-axis, the integration becomes more manageable. Trigonometric identities may assist in further simplifying the integral. Ultimately, the integral's value remains rotation independent, allowing for flexibility in coordinate selection.
go4321
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to do this integral
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-a| \vec{r}|}e^{-\vec{b}. \vec{r}}}{|\vec{r}|}
But if I write the modulus as
\vec{r}=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}
I can't figure out how to handle the annoying square root in the exponential.

Would be grateful for hints, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use spherical coordinates. Use the appropriate volume element.
 
arkajad said:
Use spherical coordinates. Use the appropriate volume element.

Doesn't the \vec{b}.\vec{r} term then become a horrible mess though?
Like b_{1}cos\theta sin \phi +b_{2}sin\theta sin \phi+... which is a pain because it is in the exponential so at best you can get it in the denominator of a fraction when you integrate r out.
 
You can use spherical coordinates for both b and r. Then use trygonometrical identities.
 
arkajad said:
You can use spherical coordinates for both b and r. Then use trygonometrical identities.

Hey, could I pester you again? I am still banging my head against the wall with this question. I have
<br /> \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\phi \int_{0}^{\pi} d\theta \int_{0}^{\infty} dr \, r \sin(\theta) \exp[r\{a+ib\left[\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)\sin(b_{\theta})\cos(b_{\phi}))+\sin(\theta)\sin(\phi)\sin(b_{\theta})\sin(b_{\phi}))+\cos(\theta)\cos(b_{\theta}\right]\}]<br />

I just cannot find a trig identity that helps though. I tried integrating out r using<br /> \int_{0}^{\infty}xe^{-ax}=1/a^{2}but couldn't get anywhere that way either
 
First notice that the value of the integral is rotation independent (it depends only on absolute value of r and on the scalar product of b and r, both invariant under rotations. Therefore you can choose your coordinate system the way you like - the result will not change. So, choose it so that the vector b, which is kept constant during the integration, has coordinates (0,0,b), b positive.

Then the trigonometry part will be almost trivial.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K