Integrating by partial fractions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of integrating functions using partial fractions, specifically focusing on integrals involving rational functions. Participants are exploring various methods and approaches to tackle these integrals, including rewriting integrands and considering substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods for integrating rational functions, including the potential use of substitutions and rewriting integrands. Questions arise about the reasoning behind certain steps and the interpretation of examples from the textbook.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on various integration techniques. Some guidance has been offered regarding rewriting integrands and the use of substitutions, though there is no explicit consensus on the best approach for all problems presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the methods presented in their textbook, particularly in relation to integrating rational functions where the degree of the numerator is less than or equal to that of the denominator. There are also mentions of specific examples that may not align with the problems being discussed.

suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having quite a bit of trouble with this topic. Here's one of the first problems, I don't really understand the method in the book, if someone could show me an easy route, it would help.

[tex]\int_{0}^{1} \frac {2x+3}{(x+1)^2}dx[/tex]

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's faster not to use partial fractions in this case. You can let u = x + 1.

What don't you understand about the method in the book?
 
Notice that your integrand may be rewritten as:
[tex]\frac{2x+3}{(x+1)^{2}}=\frac{2x+2}{(x+1)^{2}}+\frac{1}{(x+1)^{2}}=\frac{2}{(x+1)}+\frac{1}{(x+1)^{2}}[/tex]
 
I just find that the examples don't really tell me that much, I understand what they do in the examples but then when I get to a question, I rarely never know how to start it.

arildno, is there a certain way that you came up with that, or do you just see it?
 
The certain way is 3=2+1
And yes, I "just see it". (As you should as well)
 
ok, so for this one:

[tex]\int \frac{x^2}{(x-3)(x+2)^2}dx[/tex]

would I start out like this:

[tex]\frac{A}{x-3} + \frac{B}{x+2} + \frac{C}{(x+2)^2}[/tex]

and then they would just be 1, x, x
 
Eeh?
What do you mean by 1,x,x??
 
A, B, and C must be constants (they can't be x). And you know one further thing: The sum you have there must be equal to the original fraction, i.e.
[tex]\frac{A}{x-3} + \frac{B}{x+2} + \frac{C}{(x+2)^2} = \frac{x^2}{(x-3)(x+2)^2}[/tex]

Multiply it out, and then you know something else: for this to be true for ALL x the constant terms must be equal on both sides, and so must the coefficients of x, and so must the coefficients of x^2. You will then have three linear equations to solve--namely those that equate the coefficients of each power of x.

An alternative way that can help you get A, B, and C more rapidly is that you can pick x to be anything you want in that equation, since the equation must be true for all x. So what happens if you multiply both sides by (x - 3) and then set x = 3?
 
Last edited:
ok, i think I am getting that part..I have another problem now, I am not sure if I am going about it the right way.

[tex]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{x}{x^2 +4x +13}dx[/tex]

=[tex]\int_{0}^{1}1+[\frac{-x^2-3x-13}{x^2 +4x +13}]dx[/tex]..
in the book there is an example somewhat like this..they complete the square of the bottom..thats what i did and then substituted..i ended up with this so far:

[tex]x + \int \frac{-u^2+u-11}{u^2+9}du[/tex]

if this is right so far, do i just split this up into several fractions and then integrate, or is there more?
 
  • #10
I am not familiar with the technique your book uses. Why did you split off the x? With u = x + 2, you could just turn your original integral into
[tex]\int_{2}^{3} \frac{u-2}{u^2 + 9}dx[/tex]
which isn't too hard to integrate.
 
  • #11
Ortho: Not dx, but du..
 
  • #12
so you can do that?its that easy?..why from 3 to 2?
 
  • #13
this isn't the example..this is a question that resembles the example..this is the example..[tex]\int \frac{4x^2-3x+2}{4x^2-4x+3}[/tex]
 
  • #14
arildno said:
Ortho: Not dx, but du..
Oh yeah, missed that.

suspenc3, it's from 2 to 3 because when you change from x to u(x), you change the limits from (a to b) to (u(a) to u(b)).
 
  • #15
The original problem was
[tex]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{x}{x^2 +4x +13}dx[/tex]
Completing the square, x2+ 4x+ 13= (x+ 2)2+ 9. If you let u= x+ 2, then x= u- 2 so the integral becomes
[tex]\int_2^3\frac{u-2}{u^2+1}du[/tex]

To integrate that, separate it as
[tex]\int_2^3 \frac{u du}{u^2+1}+ \int_2^3\frac{du}{u^2+1}[/tex]
The first is an easy v= u2+ 1 substitution and the second is an arctangent.

I don't see any reason to take out that "1" in
[tex]\int_{0}^{1}1+[\frac{-x^2-3x-13}{x^2 +4x +13}]dx[/tex]

I wonder if the example you looked at didn't have a higher power of x in the numerator equal to that in the denominator, say
[tex]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^2}{x^2 +4x +13}dx[/tex].
Since to use partial fractions you have to have the denominator with degree larger than the numerator, the first thing you would do with that is divide to get 1+ ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K