Integrating Change Variables: Triangular Region

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhuyilun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equality of a double integral and a single integral involving a continuous function f defined on the interval [0, 1]. Specifically, it establishes that the double integral of f(x+y) over the triangular region R with vertices (0,0), (1,0), and (0,1) is equal to the single integral of u*f(u) from 0 to 1. The key insight is the use of diagonal strips for integration, where u = x + y, leading to the conclusion that the length of these strips contributes the factor of u in the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals and single integrals
  • Familiarity with the concept of triangular regions in calculus
  • Knowledge of continuous functions on closed intervals
  • Basic principles of volume calculation in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of double integrals over triangular regions
  • Learn about the method of changing variables in multiple integrals
  • Explore the concept of volume under surfaces defined by continuous functions
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of integrals in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable calculus, as well as mathematicians interested in integral transformations and geometric interpretations of integrals.

zhuyilun
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let f be continuous on [0,1] and let R be triangular region with vertices (0,0),(1,0) and (0,1) show that\int\intf(x+y) dA= \intu*f(u)du from 0 to 1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i don't know how to start this question. can anyone give me a hint to help me start this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think i didnt type the question correctly, its supposed to be a double integral of f(x+y) over the region R
and that value is equal to a single integral of u*f(u) du from u=0 to u=1
 
From your two posts, I think this is what you're trying to prove:
\int \int_R f(x + y) dA~=~ \int_{u = 0}^1 u f(u) du
where f is continuous on [0, 1] and R is the triangular region defined by the points (0, 0), (1, 0), and (0, 1).

Here are some thoughts that might be of help to you. Assuming for the moment that f is positive on its domain, the double integral represents the volume of the region above the triangular region. Normally, to calculate a volume like this, we might use either vertical strips (vertical in relation to the x-axis) of width \Delta x and length 1 - x (since y = 1 - x), and height f(x). This would be our incremental volume, or \Delta V. To get the total volume we would integrate on y, as y runs from 0 to 1.

Alternatively, we might use horizontal strips (in relation to the x-axis) that are \Delta y by 1 - y by f(y) to get \Delta V. To get the total volume, we would integrate on x, as x runs from 0 to 1.

In this problem, I think that the idea is that they want you to use diagonal strips. Instead of working directly with x or y, I think you want to work with u = x + y. All of the line segments parallel to the hypotenuse of your triangle are such that at every point on the line segment, u is constant. For example, on the segment between (1, 0) and (0, 1), u = 1, where u = x + y. On the segment that joins (1/2, 0) and (0, 1/2), u = 1/2. And so on.

Using this line of reasoning, the incremental volume element has dimensions (length of diagonal from x-axis to y-axis) X (width of strip = \Delta u) X (height = f(u) = f(x + y)). It's not too big a jump to recognize that you can get the total volume by integrating the incremental volume element from u = 0 to u = 1. If you can convince yourself that the length of each of these diagonal strips is u, then you're pretty well on your way with this problem.

One other thing: I assumed for convenience that f > 0 so I could think about the double integral as a volume. You won't be able to make this assumption, since we don't know this about f.
 
Mark44 said:
From your two posts, I think this is what you're trying to prove:
\int \int_R f(x + y) dA~=~ \int_{u = 0}^1 u f(u) du
where f is continuous on [0, 1] and R is the triangular region defined by the points (0, 0), (1, 0), and (0, 1).

Here are some thoughts that might be of help to you. Assuming for the moment that f is positive on its domain, the double integral represents the volume of the region above the triangular region. Normally, to calculate a volume like this, we might use either vertical strips (vertical in relation to the x-axis) of width \Delta x and length 1 - x (since y = 1 - x), and height f(x). This would be our incremental volume, or \Delta V. To get the total volume we would integrate on y, as y runs from 0 to 1.

Alternatively, we might use horizontal strips (in relation to the x-axis) that are \Delta y by 1 - y by f(y) to get \Delta V. To get the total volume, we would integrate on x, as x runs from 0 to 1.

In this problem, I think that the idea is that they want you to use diagonal strips. Instead of working directly with x or y, I think you want to work with u = x + y. All of the line segments parallel to the hypotenuse of your triangle are such that at every point on the line segment, u is constant. For example, on the segment between (1, 0) and (0, 1), u = 1, where u = x + y. On the segment that joins (1/2, 0) and (0, 1/2), u = 1/2. And so on.

Using this line of reasoning, the incremental volume element has dimensions (length of diagonal from x-axis to y-axis) X (width of strip = \Delta u) X (height = f(u) = f(x + y)). It's not too big a jump to recognize that you can get the total volume by integrating the incremental volume element from u = 0 to u = 1. If you can convince yourself that the length of each of these diagonal strips is u, then you're pretty well on your way with this problem.

One other thing: I assumed for convenience that f > 0 so I could think about the double integral as a volume. You won't be able to make this assumption, since we don't know this about f.

hi, i think i kinda get it. but i don't get where the extra u( infront of f(u)) come from
 
I believe that the extra u comes from the diagonal length of the base of the approximating incremental volume elements. At a given value of u, say u = x + y = k, with 0 <= k <= 1, the diagonal line segment extends from (0, k) to (k, 0), and has a length of sqrt(2k^2) = k*sqrt(2) = (x + y) sqrt(2) = u sqrt(2).

Can you provide the exact wording of the problem, particularly what you need to prove?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K