Vector Calculus: Change of Variables problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a double integral over a triangular region defined by the vertices (0,0), (1,0), and (0,1). The integral is transformed using substitutions related to vector calculus, specifically the variables u and v.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the Jacobian for the transformation and describes their integration limits. Some participants question the clarity of the computations and suggest that intermediate steps should be shared for better understanding.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking more detailed computations from the original poster to identify where errors may have occurred. There is a focus on clarifying the Jacobian calculation and the correctness of the integral evaluation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's description of their attempts is vague, which complicates the ability to provide targeted assistance. There is also mention of forum guidelines regarding the presentation of work.

Tom31415926535
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let D be the triangle with vertices (0,0), (1,0) and (0,1). Evaluate:

∫∫exp((y-x)/(y+x))dxdy for D

by making the substitutions u=y-x and v=y+x

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So first I found an equation for y and x respectively:

y=(u+v)/2 and x=(v-u)/2

Then I found the Jacobian of this transformation to be 1.

Then I started solving using the terminals as:

-v<u<v and 0<v<1

However, the final solution that I got is undefined (however I can see I was on the right track. The only issue is that there was a log(0) that screwed things up)

Where have I gone wrong?

The correct answer is 1/4(e-1/e)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are we going to be able to know where you went wrong when you only describe your attempt in vague terms? Please show us your actual computations including your intermediate steps.

Tom31415926535 said:
Then I found the Jacobian of this transformation to be 1.
This is incorrect, but does not affect the whether your integral converges or not. Again, in order to have a chance at knowing how you went wrong, we need to see your intermediate steps.
 
IMG_0810.jpg
IMG_0811.jpg


You make a good point. Here are my steps
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0811.jpg
    IMG_0811.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 296
  • IMG_0810.jpg
    IMG_0810.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 343
It would be much better and more in line with forum rules if you typed it out instead of just attaching images (see Guidelines for students and helpers, point 5). One issue is that it is impossible to quote a particular line of your computations.

Regarding the Jacobian: What is ##0.5 \cdot 0.5##?

Regarding your integral: Your inner integral is not correctly done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K