Integrating Factor Proof: Combining Equations for Exact First-Order ODEs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the integration of factors for exact first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs), specifically referencing equations (22) and (23) from a proof found on MathWorld. The user seeks clarification on the process of combining these equations to derive equation (24). The confusion arises from the notation used, particularly regarding the derivatives ∂µ/∂x and ∂µ/∂y, which should be expressed as ∂g/∂(xy) multiplied by y and x, respectively. The discussion highlights the importance of clear mathematical notation in conveying complex concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exact first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their notation
  • Knowledge of integrating factors in differential equations
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of integrating factors for exact first-order ODEs
  • Learn about the application of partial derivatives in differential equations
  • Review the notation and conventions used in mathematical proofs
  • Explore additional resources on solving exact ODEs and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, as well as educators seeking to improve clarity in mathematical communication.

physicsjock
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I've just been following this proof for a integrating factor of (xy),

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExactFirst-OrderOrdinaryDifferentialEquation.html

it starts at at equation (22)

I understood it all a few days ago and now I seem to have forgotten this one step.

It says after eq(22) and (23)

"Combining these two" gives (24)

What does it mean by combining the two?

dividing the top equation by the second?

If that's the case how come dg/dx = dg/dy ?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey physicsjock! :smile:

(22) and (23) are badly written :frown:

they should say:
∂µ/∂x = ∂g/∂(xy) y

∂µ/∂y = ∂g/∂(xy) x​

don't ever write like that! :rolleyes: :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K