Integrating \frac{1}{x^2+4} - Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozen7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function \(\frac{1}{x^2 + 4}\). Participants explore various methods and considerations for integrating this expression without relying on the derivatives of inverse functions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the necessity of knowing inverse trigonometric derivatives, while others suggest that trigonometric substitutions could simplify the integration process. There are mentions of using partial fractions and complex numbers as alternative approaches. Questions arise regarding the specifics of substitutions and the implications of using complex functions.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various proposed methods for integration, with some participants providing hints and corrections to each other's approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of different techniques, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster may not be familiar with certain advanced techniques, such as complex functions or specific substitutions. There is also a mention of homework constraints that may limit the use of certain methods.

frozen7
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2 +4}[/tex] How to integrate this without knowing the derivatives of inverse function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't know about an anti-derivative of the integrand, or are unable to transform your integrand in such a manner that an anti-derivative becomes apparent, then the fundamental theorem of calculus is of minor use to you in that particular case in the evaluation of your integral.
 
I think he/she is asking whether you need to know inverse trig derivatives/integrals to do this problem. You don't need to know the derivative of inverse trigonometric functions to do this problem, however you need to know about trig substitutions, if you can do trig substitutions then this integral can be done in two steps, one is a regular substitution that gets it in a form such as 1/(u^2 +1) and another trig substitution after that.
 
frozen7 said:
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2 +4}[/tex] How to integrate this without knowing the derivatives of inverse function?
You can use some basic algebra and the method of partial fractions..
If you facter (x^2 + 4) you get (x + 2i)(x - 2i) where i is the complex number, sqrt(-1).
From there you can decompose 1/(x^2 + 4) into two fractions:

1/(x^2 + 4) = A/(x + 2i) + B/(x - 2i)

And you'll end up with a complex logarithm as the answer-- which will fit the definition of arctan, if I'm not mistaken. (Or something like that)

Either way plugging numbers in will still get you the same results as the real answer. :)
 
what said:
this integral can be done in two steps, one is a regular substitution that gets it in a form such as 1/(u^2 +1) and another trig substitution after that.

Could you explain further?
 
I'll assume you can do the first step, then use the trig substitution x = tan(θ). Remember after you have your answer you have to get it back in terms of x, your answer will be in terms of theta.

Edit: forgot a comma and a then, it might make it confusing.
 
Last edited:
what said:
I'll assume you can do the first step, then use the trig substitution x = tan(θ). Remember after you have your answer you have to get it back in terms of x, your answer will be in terms of theta.
Edit: forgot a comma and a then, it might make it confusing.
Are you sure the substitution is [itex]x = \tan \theta[/itex]?
@frozen7:
You should look it up in your textbook or try here
So, what's the substitution? Is it [itex]x = \tan \theta[/itex]? Or what is it?
 
in the integral, you're missing the dx.

draw a triangle, it should help you see which values to substitute.
 
Last edited:
frozen7 said:
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2 +4}[/tex] How to integrate this without knowing the derivatives of inverse function?

If you know integral of inverse function it's easy.
At first [tex]\int \frac 1 {x^2+1} dx = \arctan(x)[/tex]

Now put [tex]u=2x[/tex] and you'll get

[tex]\frac 1 8 \int \frac 1 {u^2+1} du = 1/8 \arctan(2x)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
maverick, the substitution is not u=2x but u=x/2

[tex]du = \frac{dx}{2}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{x^2+4} = \frac{1}{4(\frac{x^2}{4} + 1)} = \frac{1}{4( ( \frac{x}{2} )^2 + 1)}[/tex]

marlon
 
Last edited:
  • #11
marlon said:
maverick, the substitution is not u=2x but u=x/2
[tex]\frac{1}{x^2+4} = \frac{1}{4(\frac{x^2}{4} + 1)}[/tex]
marlon

oh my bad! Thank you! I'm a bit euphoric because my favorite female speed skater Tomomi Okazaki was chosen for Trino Olympic :smile:

Then correction:

[tex]\frac 1 2 \int \frac 1 {u^2+1} du = \arctan(x/2)[/tex]

hm, this looks smarter.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
maverick6664 said:
oh my bad! Thank you!
Then correction:
[tex]\frac 1 2 \int \frac 1 {u^2+1} du = \arctan(x/2)[/tex]

I don't want to be whinning but the right hand side of your equation is not correct either. You are forgetting something :)

marlon
 
  • #13
marlon said:
I don't want to be whinning but the right hand side of your equation is not correct either. You are forgetting something :)
marlon

ooops! lol

[tex]1/2 \arctan(x/2)[/tex]

maybe i need sleep. It's 3:30am.
 
  • #14
maverick6664 said:
maybe i need sleep. It's 3:30am.

Aha, that happens to me too.

Here in Western Europe it's 19.30 pm and i am looking foreward to attend the SAW2 premiere tonight.

OOHH YES, THERE WILL BE BLOOD

Sleep well :)

marlon
 
Last edited:
  • #15
marlon said:
Aha, that happens to me too.
Here in Western Europe it's 19.30 pm and i am looking foreward to attend the SAW2 premiere tonight.
OOHH YES, THERE WILL BE BLOOD
Sleep well :)
marlon

Got up now..but it's still 7:40am..I'll sleep again.. :smile: New Years day my family will pay first visit to a nearby shrine and my father's grave, and from Jan.2 I'll be "Home alone" because my wife and daughters will be in my wife's home town for nearly a week. Still sleepy... nite... (looks like I'm hijacking this thread..:biggrin: this is a users' forum...) zzzzz...
 
  • #16
What's up with all of the arctans? Why not be frank with the function and do what you got to do... use partial fractions!?
 
  • #17
Pseudo Statistic said:
What's up with all of the arctans? Why not be frank with the function and do what you got to do... use partial fractions!?
Because
[tex]\int \frac 1 {u^2+a^2} du = \frac 1 {a} \arctan( \frac u {a} ) + C[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Pseudo Statistic said:
What's up with all of the arctans? Why not be frank with the function and do what you got to do... use partial fractions!?

Because than you would be needing complex functions. That's against the rules if the calculus must remain "real"...

[tex]\frac{1}{x^2+a^2} = \frac{1}{x+ia}\frac{1}{x-ia}[/tex]

marlon
 
  • #19
Here is the solution i was hinting at, without knowing the derivative of inverse tangent...
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2+4} dx \ u = x/2 \ du =1/2 dx [/tex]
[tex]1/2 \int \frac{1}{u^2+1} du \ u =\tan(\theta) \ du = \sec^2(\theta) d\theta [/tex]
[tex]= 1/2 \int \frac{\sec^2(\theta)}{\tan^2(\theta) +1} d\theta = 1/2 \int \frac{\sec^2(\theta)}{\sec^2(\theta)} d\theta = 1/2 \int 1 \ d\theta[/tex]
[tex]= 1/2(\theta + C)[/tex]
Now we have to bring back in terms of x so we use the way we defined the substitutions to help us..
[tex]\theta = \arctan(u) = \arctan(x/2)[/tex]
therefore...
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2+4} dx = 1/2\arctan(x/2) +C[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #20
marlon said:
Because than you would be needing complex functions. That's against the rules if the calculus must remain "real"...
[tex]\frac{1}{x^2+a^2} = \frac{1}{x+ia}\frac{1}{x-ia}[/tex]
marlon
It will-- you could then convert back to arctan using the definition of the function from Oiler's formula... the final answer will always be real wherever arctan is defined as real.. so why not?
 
  • #21
Pseudo Statistic said:
It will-- you could then convert back to arctan using the definition of the function from Oiler's formula... the final answer will always be real wherever arctan is defined as real.. so why not?

Because I doubt the original poster would know how to do that.
 
  • #22
what said:
Here is the solution i was hinting at, without knowing the derivative of inverse tangent...
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2+4} dx \ u = x/2 \ du =1/2 dx [/tex]
[tex]1/2 \int \frac{1}{u^2+1} du \ u =\tan(\theta) \ du = \sec^2(\theta) d\theta [/tex]
[tex]= 1/2 \int \frac{\sec^2(\theta)}{\tan^2(\theta) +1} d\theta = 1/2 \int \frac{\sec^2(\theta)}{\sec^2(\theta)} d\theta = 1/2 \int 1 \ d\theta[/tex]
[tex]= 1/2(\theta + C)[/tex]
Now we have to bring back in terms of x so we use the way we defined the substitutions to help us..
[tex]\theta = \arctan(u) = \arctan(x/2)[/tex]
therefore...
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2+4} dx = 1/2\arctan(x/2) +C[/tex]

that's the answer that i got, too
 
  • #23
Pseudo Statistic said:
It will-- you could then convert back to arctan using the definition of the function from Oiler's formula... the final answer will always be real wherever arctan is defined as real.. so why not?

How would you do that and still get rid of the complex variable ?
marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K