Integrating infinitesimal conformal transformations

Rocky Raccoon
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
While it's pretty easy to derive the infinitesimal version of the special conformal transformation of the coordinates:

x'^{\mu}=x^{\mu}+c_{\nu}(x^{\mu} x^{\nu}-g^{\mu \nu} x^2)

with c infinitesimal,

how does one integrate it to obtain the finite version transformation:

x'^{\mu}=\frac{x^{\mu}-x^2 c^{\mu}}{1-2 x^{\nu} c_{\nu} + x^2 c^2}

with c finite?


I've never delt with nonlinear transformations that don't exponentiate trivially. Also, how does one integrate over a parameter that is Lorentz contracted with another vector?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(First of all, I think you're missing a 2, it should be (2xμxν - gμνx2)).

In general, the way to exponentiate a transformation that acts nonlinearly is to find a different set of variables on which it is linear. In the present case, the conformal group can be generated by a) Lorentz transformations Λ, b) translations T, and c) inversion R. The inversion is R: xμ → xμ/xνxν. The transformation you're looking at is called a transversion, and can be written in terms of the generators as V = RTR-1. This gives you a clue that what you need to do to linearize V is to look at its effect on the inverted position vector, yμ ≡ xμ/xνxν. The action on yμ will be linear and easily exponentiated, and then you can go back and express the result in terms of x.
 
Yes, you're absolutely right, I'm missing a factor of 2.

So, you're saying that a simple change in variables will do the trick. I'll certainly try to do it that way. But, I was more thinking along the lines of solving the equation: dx^{\mu}=dc_{\nu}(2x^{\mu} x^{\nu} - g^{\mu \nu} x^2)? Can it be integrated?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top