Integrating \int_0^2 \sqrt{65e^{2t}} dt for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7yler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the expression \(\int_0^2 \sqrt{65 e^{2t}} dt\). Participants are exploring the simplification and manipulation of the integrand, particularly focusing on the square root and exponential components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to simplify the integrand before integration, with suggestions to express the square root in terms of its components. There are attempts to clarify the placement of constants and variables under the square root.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the expression being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the simplification, while others are questioning their understanding of the setup.

Contextual Notes

There seems to be confusion regarding the placement of the constant 65 in relation to the square root, as well as the interpretation of the exponential term. Participants are navigating these assumptions without reaching a consensus.

7yler
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I am familiar with integration, but I'm stumped with this. How do you integrate something such as \int(from 0 to 2)\sqrt{65e(to the power of 2t}dt

That is supposed to be the square root of 65e to the power of 2t.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


you should simplify the argument first.
 


Here's how you'd write your integral using LaTeX:
Code:
\int_0^2 \sqrt{65 e^{2t}} dt
which, when enclosed by "TEX" and "/TEX" (with the quotation marks replaced by square brackets), gives
\int_0^2 \sqrt{65 e^{2t}} dt​

Anyway, try using the fact that \sqrt{a}=a^{1/2}.
 


Well, another to put it would be to see that

e^{2t} = (e^t)^2

which would fit nicely with the square root.
 


So I would get 65e^2 - 65?
 


Well, the 65 is still under a radical. Only e^t is squared under the square root.
 
Last edited:


So 65(e^2) - 65 is what I get when I follow through with the calculations, but I'm told that that answer is incorrect.
 


You didn't understand. The 65 must be under the radical sign, as in \sqrt{65}.
 


Oh okay. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K