Integrating Square Roots - Absolute Value Needed?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integrating a polynomial involving square roots and absolute values. The original poster attempts to integrate the expression after factoring it, but encounters a discrepancy between their result and the solution manual's answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of integrating the expression (x-1) over the interval [0, 1], questioning whether the absolute value should be used due to the sign of the expression within the bounds. Some suggest expressing the absolute value without the signs by manipulating the expression.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights on how to handle the absolute value in the integration process. There is a recognition of the need to split the integral based on the sign of (x-1) over the specified bounds, and some guidance has been provided regarding the proper approach to expressing the integrand.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the necessity of using absolute values when integrating functions that may yield negative results within certain bounds. Participants are also reflecting on the algebraic manipulation required to simplify the integration process.

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i.minus.com/i61zvy2BbtqkI.png

Homework Equations



One can factor the polynomial to (x-1)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



After factoring the polynomial, I integrate (x-1) given the bounds of 0 and 1. I get -1/2. The solution manual says the answer is positive 1/2. What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The square root of any quantity is taken to be a positive value, by convention.

But you ended up with (x-1) which is negative, not positive. Can you think of how to fix that?
 
Redbelly98 said:
But you ended up with (x-1) which is negative, not positive. Can you think of how to fix that?

x-1 is not necessarily negative. I assume that your point is that (x-1) is negative over the the open interval of 0 to 1 (0 to 1 also happen to be the bounds of integration).

To rectify this problem, it seems, I would have to integrate the absolute value of (x-1) over the bounds of integration, right?
 
Qube said:
x-1 is not necessarily negative. I assume that your point is that (x-1) is negative over the the open interval of 0 to 1 (0 to 1 also happen to be the bounds of integration).

To rectify this problem, it seems, I would have to integrate the absolute value of (x-1) over the bounds of integration, right?

Yes. On [0,1] how can you express |x-1| without the absolute value signs?
 
In general, if you have
\sqrt{a^2} = |a|
for real a.

You can see this with a couple of specific examples:
a = -3
\sqrt{(-3)^2} = \sqrt{9} = 3 = |a|
a = 3
\sqrt{3^2} = \sqrt{9} = 3 = |a|
 
LCKurtz said:
Yes. On [0,1] how can you express |x-1| without the absolute value signs?

To express (x-1) without absolute value signs, distribute a negative 1 to each value.

That results in (-x+1)

Now I just find the integral of (1-x) over the bounds of 0 to 1.

To conclude: should I always use absolute value signs when integrating a square root function over bounds which result in the square root of a negative number?
 
Qube said:
To express (x-1) without absolute value signs, distribute a negative 1 to each value.

That results in (-x+1)

Now I just find the integral of (1-x) over the bounds of 0 to 1.

To conclude: should I always use absolute value signs when integrating a square root function over bounds which result in the square root of a negative number?

It wasn't the square root of a negative number,

it was the square root of the square of a negative number.
 
Qube said:
To express (x-1) without absolute value signs, distribute a negative 1 to each value.

That results in (-x+1)

Now I just find the integral of (1-x) over the bounds of 0 to 1.

To conclude: should I always use absolute value signs when integrating a square root function over bounds which result in the square root of a negative number?

The use of absolute value signs is a pain; just use instead the actual forms that are >= 0 over all parts of your integration range. Just for fun, and to bring home the point, try the following:
\int_0^2 \sqrt{x^2 - 2x + 1} \; dx.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
The use of absolute value signs is a pain; just use instead the actual forms that are >= 0 over all parts of your integration range. Just for fun, and to bring home the point, try the following:
\int_0^2 \sqrt{x^2 - 2x + 1} \; dx.

RGV

Thank you for providing the additional practice :)! I was stumped by the problem for quite a while, but it turns out that my algebra was at fault. Here's my solution:

\int_0^2 \sqrt{x^2 - 2x + 1} \; dx.

= \int_0^2 \left| (x - 1) \right|\; dx.

(x-1) is negative when x < 1, therefore we must distribute a negative 1 to each term to get (-x+1)

(x-1) is positive when x ≥ 1.

Given these conditions, we can now split up the integral and appropriately set the bounds of integration.

= \int_0^1 \ {(1 - x)} \; dx. + \int_1^2 \ {(x - 1)} \; dx.

= \frac{1}{2} + 1 + (\frac{-1}{2} + 1)

= 1

The takeaway seems to be:

When integrating a polynomial under a square root function, always:

1) Simplify the square root
2) Cancel out exponents
3) Use absolute value signs
4) Integrate using the appropriate bounds

I wish to really understand this topic. We use absolute value signs because the square root of any number squared has two solutions except for the number 0.

To account for that extra solution, we must use the absolute value signs, which forces us to split up the integral. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I think you've got that right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K