Integration by parts (multivariable)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of integration by parts in multivariable calculus, specifically seeking clarity on the substitutions needed to derive the formula. The user questions whether the differential notation should be adjusted to include dx_i and expresses confusion about how to apply the concept from single-variable to multiple variables. They emphasize that the choice of functions u and v significantly impacts the integration process, similar to single-variable cases. The user requests a specific example to illustrate the derivation of the integration by parts formula for their complex integrand involving multiple variables. A clear derivation would help in understanding the necessary substitutions and steps involved.
Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I can find on Wikipedia the "formula" for integration by parts for the case where there is a multi-variable integrand, but I would like to know what substitutions to make in order to show my steps.


Homework Equations


For multiple variables we have
\int_{\Omega}{{\partial u}\over{\partial x_i}}vdx=-\int_{\Omega}{{\partial v}\over{\partial x_i}}udx.
assuming that we can drop the surface term for physical reasons. Here, u and v are functions of several variables, say {x_1, x_2, ...x_n}
First of all, should the dx be a dx_i ??
Now, my real question is; what substitutions do I make in order to show this?


The Attempt at a Solution


I feel like the generalization from 1D to the above higher-D version should be obvious, but it just isn't to me. I guess what is bothering me is that e.g.
du = \sum {{\partial u}\over{\partial x_i}}dx_i. And I can't get this to fit into a derivation of the equation in 2. (above)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just as in one variable calculus, what you choose to be u and what you choose to be dv depends heavily on the particular function you are trying to integrate! Do you have a particular example to show us?
 
I don't have particular functions to work with. I have a sum like
\sum_{i} \int dx_{1}...dx_{n}dp_{1}...dp_{n} A t \left( {\partial H \over {\partial x_{i}}}{\partial \rho \over \partial p_{i}}-{\partial H \over {\partial p_{i}}}{\partial \rho \over \partial x_{i}} \right),
and I am just trying to bring the derivatives from \rho over to the A. Here, \rho and A are functions of the x_i and p_i's, and t is time, i.e an independent variable.

What would be nice is a derivation of the integration by parts formula in part 2. of my original post
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K