Integration Methods: How Can You Determine the Best Approach?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on various integration methods, specifically substitution, integration by parts, trigonometric integration, and partial fractions. Each technique is applicable based on the form of the integrand. For instance, substitution is ideal when the integrand resembles the derivative of a composition of functions, while integration by parts is suitable for products of functions. The key to mastering integration lies in practice and understanding the context in which each method is introduced in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with integration techniques: substitution, integration by parts, trigonometric integration, and partial fractions
  • Ability to identify the form of integrands
  • Experience with solving integrals by hand
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice solving integrals using substitution and integration by parts
  • Explore advanced integration techniques such as integration by partial fractions
  • Study the application of trigonometric identities in integration
  • Utilize online resources like EqWorld for additional practice and examples
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for calculus exams, educators teaching integration methods, and anyone looking to enhance their skills in solving integrals effectively.

ada15
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi,

There are different ways by which we can integrate function :
1. Substitution
2. Integration by parts
3. Trigonomtery
4. Partial functions

But how one know that which method to use ?

Please can anyone explain how to figure out the way of doing integration? I'll be really thankful.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Those are different integration techniques that are useful in different situations, depending upon what the form of your function being integrated is. I would recommend going back to you calculus text and looking up in what context each technique was introduced:

A summary would be:

1. Substitution: obviously useful when your integrand (the function being integrated) is actually the derivative of composition of two functions i.e. it has the form of something that has been differentiated using the chain rule.

2. By parts: useful when your integrand looks like one of the terms of something that has been differentiated using the product rule.

3. Trigonometry. This should be obvious! If your integrand has trigonometric functions, then it is applicable, otherwise it isn't.

4. Partial fractions: Umm...again fairly self explanatory. If I recall correctly, this is useful if your integrand can be decomposed using partial fractions.
 
Integration is an art. Take integration by parts, for example. How you decide to split an expression into u and dv makes all the difference in the world. One choice makes the problem easy to solve while other choices result in a more complex integral than the original problem.

The method to use is the one that works on the problem at hand. There are some general heuristics, but they remain heuristics.

I can usually tell whether someone has integrated some equation by hand or used a program such as Maple and Mathematica to do the job for them. The programs apply the heuristics and come up with a page-long equation. Done nicely by hand, the same integral is expressed one or two lines of math.

So how to tell which technique is right? Practice.
 
confused:
http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcTwoDIRECTORY/usubdirectory/USubstitution.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://http://dl.uncw.edu/digilib/mathematics/calculus/integration/freeze/images/FundTheorems3.gif


Lets say this question is given :
Now how do you know which method to use ?
Please can someone give me example and explain ... I have an exam tomorrow ... I am really really confused :confused: :cry: :cry:

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't see any equations in your posts. Maybe they aren't showing up? Try writing them in plain text as a last resort.
 
cepheid said:
I can't see any equations in your posts. Maybe they aren't showing up? Try writing them in plain text as a last resort.

int x cos 5x dx
int (lnx)^2 dx
int arctan 4t dt
int dx/5-3x
 
ada15 said:
int x cos 5x dx
int (lnx)^2 dx
int arctan 4t dt
int dx/5-3x

now how do i know which method to use in these integrals ? :confused:
 
ada15 said:
int x cos 5x dx
int (lnx)^2 dx
int arctan 4t dt
int dx/5-3x

Hints:

int x cos 5x dx

you have a product of two functions. What technique is usually used here?

int (lnx)^2 dx

You have a composition of functions: u = g(x) = lnx, f(u) = u^2, and we have int f(g(x)) dx. What did I just do there? What rule applies?

int arctan 4t dt

I think this is a tricky one in which you have to express this as a product and then use a previous result involving derivative of arctan as well as by parts integration.


int dx / 5 - 3x

you have integral of "1 over something". What can you do that can reduce this to a previous problem like that?

That's about all the help I can give you.
 
  • #10
thanks for the help.
 
  • #11
For \int \ln^{2}x \ dx i'd suggest part integration.

It's needed 2 times.

Daniel.
 
  • #12
Basically, integration is a "box of magic tricks" - you listed 4 of the common ones. Unlike differentiation, it's not a logical process where you can follow a set of "rules" and guarantee to get the answer.

The only way to find out which trick to use for a given integral is by solving lots of problems. Try one trick, and if it doesn't seem to help then try another one.

It it's any consolation, when doing "real work" people who need to USE integrals don't bother to solve these types of problems themselves, they just look up the answers in a book or a website like http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/auxiliary/aux-integrals.htm

You can use sites like that as a learning tool - look at the results (the simpler ones anyway!) and think how you could prove them using the integration methods you know. But DON'T try to learn all the answers!
 
  • #13
You have the wrong primary focus on this.
Your primary focus when trying to integrate something should be:
Can I transform the integrand so that the result from the transformation is something I know how to integrate?

As long as the transformation itself is a permissible mathematical action, everything is allowed to be tried out.
 
  • #14
Knowing how to integrate requires understanding each method and thinking about the individual integral. There are no "magic" formulas that can be applied without thinking!
 
  • #15
I used to have the same problem, the only thing you can do is practice as many problems as you can and eventually you'll just recognise what method to use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K