"Intensity flicker" of Extremely low frequency (ELF) waves?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter greswd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Waves
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the visibility and measurement of intensity flicker in Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) electromagnetic waves, specifically focusing on the implications of using a hypothetical ELF laser pointer and a suitable camera. The scope includes theoretical considerations, technical explanations, and some experimental references.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a camera capable of detecting ELF waves would see the intensity of a 3Hz ELF laser pointer flicker at 3Hz.
  • Others argue that the camera's limitations in capturing more than one picture per second would affect its ability to measure the frequency accurately.
  • It is suggested that if the camera detects the instantaneous energy of the incoming wave, it would produce 6 flashes per second on the viewfinder.
  • One participant mentions the relationship between time range and frequency range, referencing the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.
  • There are references to Stephen McGreevy's work on recording VLF/ELF events as sound, with some participants questioning the applicability of coherent detection to random events.
  • Clarification is provided on the meaning of 'coherent detection' as phase-sensitive rather than intensity-based.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the capabilities of the camera and the implications of coherent detection, indicating that multiple competing views remain and the discussion is unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the camera's frequency sensitivity and the assumptions regarding coherent detection methods. The discussion also touches on the relationship between classical effects and quantum mechanics without resolving these complexities.

greswd
Messages
764
Reaction score
20
ELF electromagnetic radiation is in the range of 3 to 30 Hz.

If you had a 3Hz ELF laser pointer and you had a camera that could "see" ELF, would you be able to see the intensity of the beam "flicker" at 3Hz?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The camera could not make more than one picture at a second with a reasonable frequency-sensitivity.
It could directly measure electric fields of a coherent (!) source, then it would simply see the oscillation of electric fields.
 
Why could it not make more than one picture a second?
 
greswd said:
ELF electromagnetic radiation is in the range of 3 to 30 Hz.

If you had a 3Hz ELF laser pointer and you had a camera that could "see" ELF, would you be able to see the intensity of the beam "flicker" at 3Hz?
If the camera detects the instantaneous energy of the incoming wave, it will give 6 flashes per second on the viewfinder.
 
greswd said:
Why could it not make more than one picture a second?
You get the frequency spectrum as Fourier transformation of the time (or space) distribution. If your time range is too small, your frequency range gets large. You can still see "there was something", but you cannot measure the frequency precisely. This can be treated as purely classical effect, but it is closely related to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.
tech99 said:
If the camera detects the instantaneous energy of the incoming wave, it will give 6 flashes per second on the viewfinder.
With coherent light, it will have 6 intensity maxima, yes.
 
Slightly off-topic: Stephen McGreevy did great work- he recorded VLF/ELF events as sound:

http://www.auroralchorus.com/more.htm
http://www.auroralchorus.com/

He uses coherent detection, BTW.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Slightly off-topic: Stephen McGreevy did great work- he recorded VLF/ELF events as sound:

http://www.auroralchorus.com/more.htm
http://www.auroralchorus.com/

He uses coherent detection, BTW.
I would question whether coherent detection can be applied to random events. I am guessing what is meant is direct conversion to zero IF.
 
tech99 said:
I would question whether coherent detection can be applied to random events. I am guessing what is meant is direct conversion to zero IF.

By 'coherent detection', I mean phase-sensitive as opposed to intensity only.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K