Interactions and Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy (Usps) and kinetic energy (Ke) of a bullet to determine if it penetrates a creature. The calculations provided yield Usps of 810J and Ke of 2250J, suggesting that the bullet's kinetic energy exceeds the potential energy, indicating penetration is likely. There is a debate about the impact of bullet design, such as hollow point versus armor-piercing, on penetration effectiveness. Additionally, concerns are raised about the realism of the armored skin specification in the problem. Overall, the calculations support the conclusion that the bullet would penetrate the creature.
CJoy
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The Cubarb parasite, having pursued Defiance Drake this far was not expecting either her sudden acrobatics, or to be shot by her futuristic slug throwing pistol. Nevertheless, Cubarbs have naturally flexible skin that afford them protection from projectiles, depending of course, on the amount of kinetic energy that the projectiles are carrying. The parasite's skin acts as a spring, with constant k=1.8 x 10^6 N/m, and as long as the deflection is less than 3cm (more than that and the skin breaks, and the parasite likely dies. If the bullet has a mass of 50g, and travels at 300 m/s, does the bullet bounce off the creature, or does it penetrate? How do you know?
Relevant Equations
Usp=1/2K(total s)^2
Ke=1/2mv^2
Esys=total Ke+total U+total Ethermal=Wext
Emech=total Ke+total U+ total Ethermal
Usps=1/2(1.8x10^6)(0.03)^2=810J
Ke=1/2mv^2=1/2(0.05)(300)^2=2250J
I don't know how to take it farther than this, or if this is the correct way to start the problem. If this is correct, would it be correct to assume that the bullet does penetrate the creature because Ke overcomes Usps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CJoy said:
If the bullet has a mass of 50g, and travels at 300 m/s, does the bullet bounce off the creature, or does it penetrate?
Uh ... you think maybe it matters whether the bullet is a hollow point or sharp-nosed or armor-piercing ?
 
CJoy said:
Usps=1/2(1.8x10^6)(0.03)^2=810J
Ke=1/2mv^2=1/2(0.05)(300)^2=2250J
I don't know how to take it farther than this, or if this is the correct way to start the problem. If this is correct, would it be correct to assume that the bullet does penetrate the creature because Ke overcomes Usps?
Yes, that is pretty clearly the intended approach. I agree with your calculations and your prediction for penetration.

As @phinds suggests, the armored skin specification in the problem statement does not seem very realistic or complete since it ignores the size of a projectile's pointed tip.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top