A Interatomic distance in diatomic molecules

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of electron density at a massive nucleus in diatomic molecules, specifically BaF, as a function of internuclear distance. It highlights that while atomic physics is well understood and quantum electrodynamics (QED) is highly accurate, there may still be insights to gain from measuring electron density. Recent advancements in atomic physics experiments have shown that they can surpass traditional accelerator experiments in sensitivity, particularly in niche areas like the electron's electric dipole moment. The conversation suggests that understanding these interactions may require considering three-body interactions due to the dependence on both internuclear distance and electron density. Overall, the potential for new physics beyond the standard model remains a topic of interest, albeit at higher energy scales.
Malamala
Messages
347
Reaction score
28
Hello! I know this question is quite random, but I wasn't sure how else to search for this. Assume we have a diatomic molecule with one large and one small nucleus, for example BaF, such that the electron (assume there is just one electron outside the open shell) is localized around the massive nucleus. Is there anything we can learn from the electron density at the massive nucleus as a function of the internuclear distance i.e. ##\rho_e^{Ba}(R)##? Are there any new physics models (or even SM observables) that can be constrained by measuring this dependence? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Atomic physics is well understood. At the distances and energies involved in diatomic molecules, quantum electrodynamics is extremely accurate, and any discrepancies between theory and experiment would be unmeasurably small. If you are looking to get insight on new physics beyond the standard model, you need to go to (much) higher energies.
 
phyzguy said:
If you are looking to get insight on new physics beyond the standard model, you need to go to (much)
This is not entirely true. Atomic physics experiments confirmed the values of the electron g-2 and fine structure constant that put QED on a pedestal to begin with. In recent decades, tabletop atomic physics experiments have surpassed accelerators in niche experiments, like the search for the electron's electric dipole moment. And the traditional measurements of electron g-2 or fine structure constant continue to make accelerators drool. What atomic physics systems lack in energy scale, they make up for in sensitivity.

@Malamala Need some time to think it over. It feels like it'd have to be a three-body interaction since it depends on both the internuclear distance AND the electron density at the massive nucleus.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...

Similar threads