MHB What are the Intercepts of the Sine Wave $y=\sin{2(x-\frac{\pi}{4})}$?

AI Thread Summary
To find the x-intercepts of the sine wave given by the equation y = sin(2(x - π/4)), set y to 0, leading to the equation 2(x - π/4) = nπ, where n is any integer. This simplifies to x = (nπ/2) + π/4, providing a general solution for the intercepts. The discussion emphasizes that the sine function equals zero at integer multiples of π, thus resulting in infinitely many intercepts. For specific solutions within the range of 0 to 2π, n can take values 0, 1, or 2. The conversation also touches on the correct usage of LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$y=\sin{2(x-\frac{\pi}{4})}$

how do you find the x intercepts of this

thot if 0=sin(2x-(pi/2)) then 0=2x-(pi/2) since sin(0)=0 but doen't look it

still don't know how to convert this to latex

K
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track. Start with y=0 and then like you said use the fact that sin(0)=0. So solve [math]2x-\frac{\pi}{2}=0[/math]. That is only one of possibly infinite intercepts though. For what values of theta, does [math]\sin(\theta)=0[/math]? Not just at 0. How can you generalize these?
 
well i did this 0=2(x-(pi/4)) so from this looks like if x = (pi/4) then the intercepts this plus K(pi/4)+pi ?
 
Last edited:
Not quite sure I would agree with the solutions so far. $\sin(z)=0$ when $z=n\pi$, for any integer $n$. So, set $2(x-\pi/4)=n\pi$ and solve for $x$. What do you get?
 
I would use Ackbach's method to solve this. We know that $\sin(x) = 0$ when $x = n\pi$ where n is an integer (you can check this by graphing the result and using the periodicity of sin(x) to extend it)
Thus $2\left(x- \frac{\pi}{4}\right) = n\pi \Leftrightarrow x - \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{n\pi}{2}$

Add $\frac{\pi}{4}$ to both sides to get the general set of solutions.

Typically these questions ask for solutions between $0$ and $2\pi$. If this is the case then $n=0,1,2$

-------------------------

To render latex, use a single dollar sign at each end of your latex (or a double dollar sign to centre it, again at each end). http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?27-How-to-use-LaTeX-on-this-site has more information including how to decode someone else's (although I go with the quote the post and look for myself method :cool:)

Code:
$2\left(x- \frac{\pi}{4}\right) = n\pi \Leftrightarrow x - \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{n\pi}{2}$
becomes $2\left(x- \frac{\pi}{4}\right) = n\pi \Leftrightarrow x - \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{n\pi}{2}$
 
Doh! Sorry guys and thanks for catching my mistake. Clearly it's not [math]2 \left(x-\frac{\pi}{4} \right) + n\pi[/math] but when [math]2 \left(x-\frac{\pi}{4} \right) = n\pi[/math]
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top