Interchanging mathematical operations proof

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two mathematical proofs concerning the conditions under which certain polynomial identities hold true. The first proof states that (x+y)^(2n+1) equals x^(2n+1) + y^(2n+1) only if x and y are both zero or y equals -x. The second proof claims that (x+y)^(2n) equals x^(2n) + y^(2n) if either x or y is zero. The original poster has attempted induction and summation techniques but has encountered difficulties, while also discovering a related equality that may assist in proving the first statement. A suggestion to explore differentiation as a potential method for proving these identities was made, highlighting the need for further exploration of this approach.
homegrown898
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm working on the following two proofs:

1.) (x+y)2n+1 = x2n+1 + y2n+1 if and only if x=0, y=0 or y=-x

and

2.) (x+y)2n = x2n + y2n if and only if x=0 or y=0

I've tried using induction and get stuck at a certain point. I've also tried playing around with summations since there is a binomial expansion in there. I haven't had any luck. Earlier today however I found that this equality is true:

x2n+1 + y2n+1 = (x+y)(x2n - x2n-1y + x2n-2y2 - ... - xy2n-1 + y2n)

I haven't played around with this yes, but I think setting this equal to (1) might help prove this.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any ideas on this.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hi homegrown898! :smile:

have you tried differentiating?
 
I haven't tried that no and I'm not exactly sure what you mean
 
if eg (1 + x)6 - 1 - x6 = 0 at x = 0 and at x = something else,

then its derivative must be zero somewhere in between :wink:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top