Interesting article on the nature of mathematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges of effectively communicating the beauty and utility of mathematics and physics. Participants acknowledge the frequent disconnect between the appreciation of these subjects and the ability to convey their significance to others. The article linked highlights these issues, prompting reflections on the difficulties faced in sharing the value of mathematical concepts and their applications. The conversation emphasizes the need for better communication strategies to bridge this gap and foster a deeper understanding of mathematics and physics among broader audiences.
Physics news on Phys.org
Good article. I see this all the time, but personally don't know what to do about it. Most of this on this forum probably see the beauty and utility of mathematics and physics, but it can be a very hard thing to communicate.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top