Interesting Claus Kiefer article: fermions decohere geometry

In summary: Your Name]In summary, the conversation focused on the idea of considering the quantum nature of geometry and its interaction with fermions. The concept of geometry being modeled by a swarm of little triads and how fermions can affect their orientation was discussed, as well as the potential consequences of this interaction. The importance of taking unconventional ideas seriously in scientific inquiry was also emphasized, with a mention of a recent paper by Kiefer and Schell exploring this concept.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
The interest of this article was first pointed out by Tom Stoer in biblio thread comment.

The idea is to take seriously the quantum nature of geometry and its interaction with fermions at the quantum level.

The idea is even that geometry might be as we experience it BECAUSE her little triads have been forced to decide what they choose to be classically by being bumped and jostled by fermions.

Well, suppose at the quantum level geometry really IS modeled by a swarm of little triads (little three-legged things) and these first originate as quantum beings.
But then of course they interact with matter---that is the whole idea of General Relativity: geometry and matter interact.

And fermions, especially, are able to distinguish the ORIENTATION of the three-legged things when they interact. So they bounce off entangled, and the triad is jangled into making up its mind. And the information flows out into the environment. And the state of geometry as a separate item decoheres into some classicalized version. Suppose.

IMHO Kiefer shows an excellent quality of mind by being willing to take that scenario seriously and study it. That is what the best scientists often are doing: taking something seriously (that might sound far-fetched from a conventional standpoint) and going thru with it to the consequences. I don't pretend to be qualified to judge, but I think it's cool. Take a look at his recent paper (with a coauthor named Schell) and see what you think.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0418
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dear Tom Stoer,

Thank you for bringing this article to our attention. I find the idea of considering the quantum nature of geometry and its interaction with fermions to be quite intriguing. It's always fascinating to see how different fields of science can intersect and influence each other.

The concept of geometry being modeled by a swarm of little triads, and how fermions can affect their orientation, is definitely a thought-provoking one. It's also interesting to consider how this interaction between geometry and matter could potentially lead to the classicalized version that we experience.

I completely agree with your statement about taking unconventional ideas seriously and exploring their consequences. This is what true scientific inquiry is all about, and I commend Kiefer and Schell for doing so in their recent paper.

I will definitely take a look at their research and see what insights I can gain from it. Thank you again for bringing this to our attention and for your thoughtful comments on the subject.
 

What is the main focus of Claus Kiefer's article on fermions and decoherence in geometry?

The main focus of Claus Kiefer's article is to explore the relationship between fermions, which are elementary particles that make up matter, and decoherence, which is the process by which quantum systems lose their quantum behavior and become classical. Kiefer also examines how this relationship is affected by the geometry of space-time.

Why is the study of fermions and decoherence in geometry important?

Studying the relationship between fermions, decoherence, and geometry is important for understanding the fundamental nature of reality and the behavior of quantum systems. It can also have practical applications in fields such as quantum computing and quantum information processing.

What does Kiefer's research suggest about the role of geometry in decoherence?

Kiefer's research suggests that the geometry of space-time plays a crucial role in the process of decoherence. Specifically, he argues that the curvature of space-time can lead to differences in the dynamics of fermions and result in decoherence.

What are some potential implications of Kiefer's findings?

Kiefer's findings have potential implications for our understanding of the origins of classical behavior in quantum systems, as well as the possibility of manipulating decoherence in order to better control quantum systems. They may also have implications for theories of quantum gravity and the nature of space-time itself.

What further research is needed in this area?

While Kiefer's research sheds light on the relationship between fermions, decoherence, and geometry, there are still many questions that remain unanswered. Further research is needed to better understand how other factors, such as interactions with other particles, may influence decoherence in fermionic systems. Additionally, more studies are needed to explore the implications of these findings for other areas of physics, such as cosmology and particle physics.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top