B Intermediate Axis Theorem - Intuitive Explanation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Intermediate Axis Theorem, particularly the instability of rotation about the middle axis. It highlights that examining a surface of fixed energy reveals six equilibria in three pairs, with the middle axis exhibiting saddle points, leading to instability. The "flipping" phenomenon observed in simulations corresponds to movement near a heteroclinic cycle between these saddle points. The conversation references previous videos and a Veritasium post for additional context. Overall, the thread emphasizes the dynamics of rotational stability and energy conservation in relation to the theorem.
A.T.
Science Advisor
Messages
12,916
Reaction score
3,962
A simulation/animation/explanation based on the inertial frame only:

The previous videos referenced there are here:

See also this post for context on the Veritasium video: https://mathoverflow.net/a/82020

Note to mods: The previous thread is not open anymore so I opened a new one. Feel free to merge them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, Filip Larsen and BvU
Physics news on Phys.org
Here one of the more abstract approaches based on energy/momentum conservation. Unfortunately not much explanation in the video, and just a short description:



Robert Ghrist said:
Why is rotation about the middle axis unstable? If you examine a surface of fixed energy and look at the dynamics, you get six equilibria in three pairs -- rotation about each axis CW and CCW. These equilibria are centers for the longest and shortest axes. But for the middle axis -- the equilibria are saddles! The "flipping" seen in the previous video corresponds to traveling close to a heteroclinic cycle between saddle points.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top