International Harvester HT340 Turbine Tractor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the International Harvester HT340 Turbine Tractor, a 1960 experimental model that ultimately failed to gain popularity. Participants express nostalgia for vintage machinery while contrasting it with modern technology. The HT340's significant flaw was its fuel consumption, burning 1 gallon every 5 minutes, compared to similar tractors that consume about 5 gallons per hour. The conversation also highlights personal preferences for brands like John Deere, particularly among those from agricultural regions like Iowa.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of agricultural machinery and its historical context
  • Familiarity with fuel consumption metrics in tractors
  • Knowledge of major tractor brands, specifically International Harvester and John Deere
  • Awareness of the evolution of tractor technology from the 1960s to present
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and performance of the International Harvester HT340 Turbine Tractor
  • Explore the history and impact of turbine technology in agricultural machinery
  • Compare fuel efficiency metrics of various tractor models from the 1960s to today
  • Investigate the reasons behind brand loyalty in agricultural equipment, focusing on John Deere and International Harvester
USEFUL FOR

Agricultural engineers, vintage machinery enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the evolution of tractor technology and brand loyalty in farming equipment.

jack action
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
9,895
Why am I so jaded with today's technology and when I see the stuff they made in the past, I feel like a kid in a candy store?

This is a replica of an experimental turbine tractor from 1960. Got more flaws than advantages, but boy, does it look cool!

source: www.facebook.com/jctractors/videos/260711662528508

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009, russ_watters and Keith_McClary
Engineering news on Phys.org
Looks like it did not catch on. I'd prefer a John Deere, but then I'm biased because I live in Iowa.
 
LOL. Once down at the firehouse, my fellow firemen were bragging about their garden tractors. Features, size, power, ... Finally they turned to me and asked, "What kind of tractor do you have?"

I replied, "I have a non-motorized push mower, and my wife pushes it. That keeps her slim and healthy without trips to the gym." :wink:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jack action
anorlunda said:
LOL. Once down at the firehouse, my fellow firemen were bragging about their garden tractors. Features, size, power, ... Finally they turned to me and asked, "What kind of tractor do you have?"

I replied, "I have a non-motorized push mower, and my wife pushes it. That keeps her slim and healthy without trips to the gym." :wink:
If someone were bragging about their riding lawnmower and asked me what kind of 'tractor' I had I would likely laugh so hard they would think I had a medical condition.
 
Dr.D said:
Looks like it did not catch on. I'd prefer a John Deere, but then I'm biased because I live in Iowa.
First I've seen of that! Yes, I was driving a John Deere 4010 back at that time (in Northern Illinois, mostly 'green' country then, maybe still?). But we were open minded, had a little red IH Farmall H as well. Would still be a while before I could get my drivers license though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Dr.D

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K