Interpreting gram stain results...unknown organism

  • Thread starter Thread starter fansounds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Organism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on interpreting gram stain results for an unknown organism, where the user observes both purple (gram-positive) and pink (gram-negative) cocci, leading to confusion about the expected uniformity of color. The user questions whether the presence of both colors indicates a staining issue, suggesting that incomplete staining or poor technique may be factors. They also mention that old or poorly made stains can yield erroneous results and that proper washout steps are crucial for accurate differentiation. The consensus leans towards the possibility of needing to redo the stain to clarify results. Overall, the user is seeking guidance on resolving the discrepancies in their gram staining observations.
fansounds
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We've been given unknowns and now have to determine what the organism is. I'm having trouble interpreting gram staining results. As far morphology they are all cocci and (sort of) in clusters but (this is the confusing part) they are both purple and pink. I understand that purple indicates gram+ and pink is gram- , but there should be one genus of organism not two. So shouldn't there be only purple or only pink, but not both? Should I be looking for the "majority" color and using that to decide whether I have pos or neg? That is, if its mostly purple, does that mean pos, ...but if so, then why are there still pink cocci on the slide?

Homework Equations


I also understand why gram-pos appear purple, --that the crystal violet-iodine complex is retained due to thicker cell walls in gram-pos... and thinner cell walls in gram-neg, so they are decolorized and appear the color of the counterstain.

Also I definitely did not see any rods in my slide, just cocci.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks for answer ygggdrasil...its definitely not gram variable/gram indeterminate because I asked prof about this...I think I will redo the stain though
 
Are others having similar problems?

Old or poorly made stains can give erroneous results.
Sometimes it is useful to centrifuge or filter them (using something like a micron scale filter) to remove particles that can adhere to tissue non-specifically.

Washout steps can be important for getting a good differentiation in staining.
 
yup centrifuging would help but the thing is this is just an intro to microbio class so I'm restricted to what test I can do. So this is all probably due to poor technique (specifically either over/under decolorizing) so I'm just going to redo
 
If everyone else has the same problem, it could be the stain.

If not I would guess the decoloring.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top