Intro statistical mechanics question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between macrostates and microstates in statistical mechanics, emphasizing that the macrostate observed is the one corresponding to the highest number of microstates. Each macrostate can arise from numerous indistinguishable microstates, with the most probable macrostate being the one with the largest number of microstates, thus having the highest entropy. The confusion arises from the notion that while a specific macrostate exists for a system, its likelihood of being observed is determined by the number of microstates that can lead to it. As microstates change due to particle interactions, the macrostate can also shift, but the most common macrostate will always be the one with the greatest number of associated microstates. This principle explains why certain macrostates are rarely observed, as they correspond to fewer microstates.
Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
Consider the quote ''The macrostate which corresponds to the highest number of microstates which result in that macrostate, is the state which will be observed.''

Can someone specify in which context this is correct because I'm quite confused by it. If I have an isolated box with N particles in it, clearly it has some definite macrostate. Then the macrostate is definite, and not decided by the highest number of microstates. So I'd like some elaboration on what it means.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What they mean is that each macrostate can be produced by a number W of indistinguishable microstates. The most probable macrostate is the one for which W is the largest. Put differently, the entropy is S=k_B lnW in this case, so the preferred state is the one with highest entropy.
 
Coffee_ said:
Consider the quote ''The macrostate which corresponds to the highest number of microstates which result in that macrostate, is the state which will be observed.''

Can someone specify in which context this is correct because I'm quite confused by it. If I have an isolated box with N particles in it, clearly it has some definite macrostate. Then the macrostate is definite, and not decided by the highest number of microstates. So I'd like some elaboration on what it means.

At any given instant, a box containing a gas of N particles has some microstate, defined by the states of all the individual particles making up the gas. It's also true that that configuration of particles defines the macrostate of the gas (i.e., its bulk properties).

At any given instant, the particles making up the gas are randomly colliding with one another, exchanging energy and momentum. The microstate of the gas changes randomly, Since the particular microstate defines what the bulk properties are too, the macrostate changes, however slightly as the microstate changes.

Since there are many microstates that could correspond to the same macrostate, and all microstates are equally likely, we can understand the following. The macrostate that has the most microstates is the one that's most likely to be seen at any given instant. Since there are vastly more microstates where the configurations of particles is nearly evenly distributed, we almost never see, for example, a gale force wind spontaneously blow in a still, sealed room.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top