- #121
- 10,266
- 45
\neq
Introducing LaTeX Math Typesetting
- Context: LaTeX
- Thread starter chroot
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Introducing Latex Typesetting
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the introduction of LaTeX mathematical typesetting on Physics Forums, focusing on its implementation, usage, and examples. Participants explore how to effectively use LaTeX for mathematical expressions and share examples of LaTeX code.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- Warren introduces LaTeX typesetting, explaining its markup style and how to include LaTeX graphics in posts.
- Some participants share additional examples of LaTeX code, demonstrating various mathematical expressions.
- Warren invites suggestions for LaTeX packages to include, expressing concern about performance impacts from too many packages.
- One participant inquires about using the LaTeX generator for personal web pages, prompting a discussion about server load and intended use.
- Another participant expresses enthusiasm for practicing LaTeX by writing equations related to particle interactions.
- A question arises about formatting subscripts in LaTeX, specifically how to create multi-line subscripts.
- Participants provide tips on learning LaTeX, including quoting existing code to see how it is written and encouraging practice.
- Warren reminds participants that clicking on LaTeX images reveals the source code, which can aid in learning.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the usefulness of LaTeX for typesetting mathematics, but there are differing views on its application for personal use outside the forum, with some cautioning against it due to resource concerns.
Contextual Notes
Some participants express uncertainty about specific LaTeX formatting techniques and the potential performance implications of adding more packages to the forum's LaTeX capabilities.
- #122
BLUE_CHIP
\Delta{T}
lux
V
R_1
R_{LDR}
\simeq{6V}
I
I=\frac{V_{out}-V_{LDR}}{R_1}
R=\frac{V}{I}
\Longrightarrow
...(1)
...(2)
(1),(2)
R_{LDR}=\frac{V_{LDR}R_1}{V_{out}-V_{LDR}}
R_1=\sqrt{(10^7-\lim_{R\rightarrow 0})}
R_{Max}
R_{Min}
=3162.27766
\simeq{3000}\Omega
\frac{\delta{y}}{\delta{x}}=\frac{9}{7.8}
=1\frac{1}{13}
R-R_1=m((lux)-(lux)_1)
R-8=-1\frac{1}{13}((lux)-4)
R=-1\frac{1}{13}(lux)+4\frac{4}{13}
13R-14(lux)=160
R=\frac{160-14(lux)}{13}
R=e^{\frac{160-14ln(lux)}{13}}
I=\frac{V}{R}
I=\frac{Q}{t}
ln(R)=\frac{1}{ln(lux)}
\frac{\pi}{6}(0.3)^{3}(7.07)g=\frac{\pi}{6}(0.3)^{3}(1.26)g+3\pi(0.88){u}(0.3)
u=\frac{d^{2}}{18\mu}[\tex]<br /> \frac{ud\rho}{\mu}[\tex]
lux
V
R_1
R_{LDR}
\simeq{6V}
I
I=\frac{V_{out}-V_{LDR}}{R_1}
R=\frac{V}{I}
\Longrightarrow
...(1)
...(2)
(1),(2)
R_{LDR}=\frac{V_{LDR}R_1}{V_{out}-V_{LDR}}
R_1=\sqrt{(10^7-\lim_{R\rightarrow 0})}
R_{Max}
R_{Min}
=3162.27766
\simeq{3000}\Omega
\frac{\delta{y}}{\delta{x}}=\frac{9}{7.8}
=1\frac{1}{13}
R-R_1=m((lux)-(lux)_1)
R-8=-1\frac{1}{13}((lux)-4)
R=-1\frac{1}{13}(lux)+4\frac{4}{13}
13R-14(lux)=160
R=\frac{160-14(lux)}{13}
R=e^{\frac{160-14ln(lux)}{13}}
I=\frac{V}{R}
I=\frac{Q}{t}
ln(R)=\frac{1}{ln(lux)}
\frac{\pi}{6}(0.3)^{3}(7.07)g=\frac{\pi}{6}(0.3)^{3}(1.26)g+3\pi(0.88){u}(0.3)
u=\frac{d^{2}}{18\mu}[\tex]<br /> \frac{ud\rho}{\mu}[\tex]
Last edited by a moderator:
- #123
outandbeyond2004
- 216
- 0
I thought Latex did not work, but it did. The trouble seems to be with the Review message function. try \pm8 and hit the check button. it is supposed to be plus-minus 8, but comes out f1 8. Latex does work after you send the message, tho.
Last edited:
- #124
Janitor
Science Advisor
- 1,107
- 1
Testing... one... two... three...
Alrighty------
Humble \pi
John Lennon \longleftrightarrowYoko Ono
Rev. Jim Bakker \heartsuit Jessica Hahn.
Beyonce' = \bigodot \bigodot
Charlie's Angels = \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot
\exists Elvis iff \infty= -33.043034.
Hello Dave. I am your HAL-9000 heuristic, algorithmic digital computer. Would you like me to open the pod bay door? \bowtie \perp \parallel \frown
Alrighty------
Humble \pi
John Lennon \longleftrightarrowYoko Ono
Rev. Jim Bakker \heartsuit Jessica Hahn.
Beyonce' = \bigodot \bigodot
Charlie's Angels = \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot \bigodot
\exists Elvis iff \infty= -33.043034.
Hello Dave. I am your HAL-9000 heuristic, algorithmic digital computer. Would you like me to open the pod bay door? \bowtie \perp \parallel \frown
Last edited:
- #125
Clausius2
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 1,433
- 7
Anyone knows where can I download LaTex as a ZIP file? My download rate is too slow.
- #126
Philcorp
- 23
- 0
Ok. I've been trying to know how to make a lower case script r (for example, like in Griffiths' Electrodynamics book) for about a year now...i was wondering if anyone around here maybe knew how?
- #127
JohnDubYa
- 468
- 1
This board is another reason PHYSICS RULES!
Okay, I have to try this out
\int_\infty^0 \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\,dx
Okay, I have to try this out
\int_\infty^0 \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\,dx
- #128
JohnDubYa
- 468
- 1
He wants a script r. I am not sure how Griffith's r's look, but have you tried the calligraphic style?
Try R_{\cal R}
Try [ tex ]R_{\cal R}[ \tex ]
I don't think it works with lowercase.
Try R_{\cal R}
Try [ tex ]R_{\cal R}[ \tex ]
I don't think it works with lowercase.
Last edited:
- #129
Cod
- 324
- 4
You have to use a forward slash ( / ). It won't work if you use back slash ( \ ).
Last edited:
- #130
Janitor
Science Advisor
- 1,107
- 1
x^3 + m^2
\partial\^2
i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t} = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2} + V\Psi
\partial z
\partial_z
\partial^2
\partial\^2
\partial^2 + m^2
det[\partial^2 + m^2]
\partial\^2
i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t} = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2} + V\Psi
\partial z
\partial_z
\partial^2
\partial\^2
\partial^2 + m^2
det[\partial^2 + m^2]
Last edited:
- #131
JohnDubYa
- 468
- 1
I am posting this demo for Dan:
\int_\infty^0 \sin(\theta)
\int_\infty^0 \sin(\theta)
- #132
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 14,922
- 28
LaTeX doesn't seem to work yet in the new forums. 
- #133
- 19,881
- 10,890
chroot still needs to install it, hopefully tonight
- #134
JohnDubYa
- 468
- 1
I still want this LaTeX capability for my own discussion boards for helping students with remedial math. Is it available? Can I buy it?
- #135
- 10,266
- 45
It's custom-designed, by me. If you'd like to contract me to work on your site, send me a PM...
- Warren
- Warren
- #136
- 10,266
- 45
Testing...
x^{5000}
x^{5000}
- #137
- 10,266
- 45
Testing...
\int_\infty^0 \sin(\theta)
\int_\infty^0 \sin(\theta)
- #138
- 10,266
- 45
Testing...
<br /> \gamma \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}<br />
<br /> \gamma \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}<br />
- #139
- 10,266
- 45
Testing...
<br /> R^{a}{}_{bcd}<br />
<br /> R^{a}{}_{bcd}<br />
Last edited:
- #140
- 10,266
- 45
All right folks, looks like LaTeX is back in business on the new pf. Feel free to let me know if anything seems not to work!
- #141
- 10,266
- 45
One more test!
a^x_n
a^x_n
- #142
KSCphysics
- 31
- 0
[ tex ]x^3[ \tex ]
- #143
KSCphysics
- 31
- 0
R^{x}{}_{bcd}
- #144
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 14,922
- 28
Why are we getting these extra dashes?
- #145
Michael D. Sewell
\Delta(x) = v_o + 1/2at^2
cool^n
cool^n
Last edited by a moderator:
- #146
Michael D. Sewell
\Delta x = v_o - 1/2at^2
\Delta x = v_o - 1/2at^2
2drinks = meow^2
\Delta x = v_o - 1/2at^2
2drinks = meow^2
Last edited by a moderator:
- #147
- 10,266
- 45
What extra dashes?Hurkyl said:
- Warren
- #148
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 14,922
- 28
These dashes.
- #149
- 10,266
- 45
Hurkyl,
That's kinda funny. I don't see those dashes in my browser. Can you right click on a latex image and view it by itself in a new window? Do the dashes still appear there?
- Warren
That's kinda funny. I don't see those dashes in my browser. Can you right click on a latex image and view it by itself in a new window? Do the dashes still appear there?
- Warren
- #150
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 14,922
- 28
Nope.
BTW, someone else mentioned also having this problem, I don't remember who.
BTW, someone else mentioned also having this problem, I don't remember who.
Similar threads
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 8 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 1 ·