Introduction to Optics (by Fowler) any good?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user seeking feedback on a book they were considering purchasing for ten dollars. They express concern about the value of the investment, asking for experiences from others. However, shortly after, the user announces they have already purchased the book, indicating they no longer require feedback. The conversation includes a light-hearted tone with a holiday greeting.
chente12
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have recently been looking into purchasing this book. I know it’s only ten dollars, but money is money, and if some of you pleasant people have any experience with this book I’d appreciate any feedback (of the book). Thank you and have a Merry X-mas. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I’m sorry, i meant fowles not fowler
 
Don’t need feedback, bought the book already
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top