Intuition problem about an accelerating barometer

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a barometer in an accelerating elevator, specifically addressing how the pressure and liquid levels in the barometer change during upward and downward acceleration. Participants explore the implications of pseudo forces and gravitational effects on the barometer's readings, questioning the interpretations presented in a textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that when the elevator accelerates upwards, the pressure on the liquid in the barometer should increase, leading to a rise in the water level, contrary to what their textbook states.
  • Another participant questions whether a force acting on the liquid increases air pressure, indicating confusion about the relationship between pressure and the forces at play.
  • Some participants discuss the effects of pseudo forces acting on both the liquid and the air in the elevator, raising questions about how these forces influence pressure readings.
  • Mathematical models are proposed to analyze the situation, with participants presenting different equations to describe the relationship between external pressure, gravitational effects, and liquid height in the barometer.
  • There is a discussion about whether the pressure difference due to height in an accelerating elevator should be considered, with some participants suggesting it can be neglected.
  • Confusion arises regarding the validity of two different mathematical approaches, with participants seeking clarification on which model accurately describes the situation.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made in their calculations and the implications of equating pressures before and after acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct interpretation of the barometer's behavior in an accelerating elevator. Multiple competing views and interpretations of the mathematical models remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about air pressure changes, the treatment of the liquid and air as separate entities, and the implications of pseudo forces. The mathematical steps presented are also subject to scrutiny and may not align with the textbook's explanations.

  • #31
I think it is pretty straight forward... there would be more pressure at the bottom of the elevator due to the acceleration of the elevator creating a higher pressure zone near the bottom, and the mercury (barometer liquid) would also have more effective weight, so 14.7psi (the benchmark for ambient at 29.92") would equate to a lower (position) value on the barometer. say the acceleration was double that of gravity, then 15" of mercury might equate to 14.7psi. (for example)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
zanick said:
then 15" of mercury might equate to 14.7psi. (for example)
A shorter column of mercury could certainly do the job if the elevator is rising.
The point is that the air pressure in the elevator could balance the mercury if the elevator cab was tall enough to increase the effective weight of air inside it.
I have also considered another experiment. If a sealed piston were at the top of the cab, with neutral density (a weighted helium balloon, for instance) could also maintain the same ambient pressure as the cab went up or down. (A bit sketchy on the details though, I'm afraid.)
 
  • #33
sophiecentaur said:
A shorter column of mercury could certainly do the job if the elevator is rising.
The point is that the air pressure in the elevator could balance the mercury if the elevator cab was tall enough to increase the effective weight of air inside it.
I have also considered another experiment. If a sealed piston were at the top of the cab, with neutral density (a weighted helium balloon, for instance) could also maintain the same ambient pressure as the cab went up or down. (A bit sketchy on the details though, I'm afraid.)
why would the elevators height be a factor ? elevator's are no air tight as you can feel your ears pop as you go up or down in one. the air pressure in the cab is the weight of the air above you to the edge of space. It would make no sense to seal it, and expand it to the edge of space when that is a condition you already have. ;) that's where the 14.7psi comes from. (and slightly less as you arrive at your 100th floor destination) . or do you mean , if you wanted to double the pressure in the elevator, that was sealed, it would have to be extended to space AND accelerated at 1g. vs accelerating 1g of the elevator sealed where the weight of the air would not change as much due to much less air mass to have its weigh increased causing a smaller pressure gradient rise?
 
  • #34
zanick said:
why would the elevators height be a factor ? elevator's are no air tight as you can feel your ears pop as you go up or down in one. the air pressure in the cab is the weight of the air above you to the edge of space. It would make no sense to seal it, and expand it to the edge of space when that is a condition you already have. ;) that's where the 14.7psi comes from. (and slightly less as you arrive at your 100th floor destination) . or do you mean , if you wanted to double the pressure in the elevator, that was sealed, it would have to be extended to space AND accelerated at 1g. vs accelerating 1g of the elevator sealed where the weight of the air would not change as much due to much less air mass to have its weigh increased causing a smaller pressure gradient rise?
I maybe didn't describe the thought very well. It's easy to increase the 'weight' of the mercury column by accelerating it upwards. It's much harder to increase the 'weight' of the air above it. One way would be to use a very high cab, containing all the significant volume of the air above. Accelerating it upwards would increase the weights of mercury and air columns and produce the same reading for pressure. OR you could replace the 100km column of air with a piston which would produce an equivalent increase in internal pressure as the cab accelerates upwards. Both experiments are particularly 'thought-only' types and a bit futile but - hell why not?

PS it wouldn't be necessary too move far, vertically. The acceleration could be over a very small distance so the change in ambient pressure with altitude need not be relevant.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K